透過您的圖書館登入
IP:3.128.30.77
  • 期刊
  • OpenAccess

環境程序正義在褐地重建中的實踐條件:我國污染土地再利用實例的觀察分析

Prerequisites for Practicing Procedural Environmental Justice: A Case Study on the Reclamation of Polluted Land in Taiwan

摘要


本研究利用近代正義理論的肯認與能力途徑,檢視環境程序正義在我國褐地重建實務中實踐的困境,進而探索落實環境程序正義的支持條件。有意義的民眾參與是實踐環境程序正義的核心,本研究利用我國第一個納入民眾參與機制的污染土地再利用示範計畫,藉由協助執行民眾參與過程,就近觀察民眾參與在理想與實際上的差距。研究發現肯認與能力二者交相影響著民眾參與的過程,利害關係者彼此缺乏肯認,導致民眾參與動機不足,而民眾缺乏專業能力,也因而無法實質貢獻於相關決策過程。本文最後針對民眾參與動機與參與能力兩個面向,提出幾個實踐環境程序正義於我國褐地重建實務的先決條件。分別是政府部門肯認污染受害者的損失與污染場址周邊居民的環境風險;污染場址周邊居民肯認自己的環境權;以及參與民眾需要專業知識的裝備。

並列摘要


Applying the recognition and capacity approach from contemporary theories of justice, the difficulties of and prerequisites for practicing procedural environmental justice in brownfield redevelopment are explored in this paper. Meaningful public participation in the decision-making process is the core of practicing procedural environmental justice. By observing the polluted land reclamation program which intends to establish public participation mechanism for the first time in Taiwan, this paper analyzes the gap between ideal kind of public participation and the reality in practice. The major finding of this research is that the interaction between recognition and capacity affects the public participation process. A lack of recognition between stakeholders reduces participatory incentives for the neighboring residents. In addition, a lack of professional capacity impedes stakeholders' meaningful contribution to the decision-making process. This paper concludes by naming prerequisites for practicing procedural justice in brownfield redevelopment as follows. The government recognizes the losses suffered by pollution victims and the environmental risks faced by the neighboring residents; the residents recognize their right to a healthy environment; and the residents are equipped with the professional knowledge to participate in the decision-making process.

參考文獻


行政院環保署,2013<土壤及地下水汙染整治基金管理會第37次委員會議書面資料>,行政院環保署網頁http://sgw.epa.gov.tw/SGM/GenericHandler/NewsAttach.ashx?fileId=1108&fileType=i&logType=B05,2016/6/13
行政院環保署,2015, <環保署101年重要施政成果及102年未來工作計畫>,行政院環保署網頁http://223.200.80.126/ct.asp?xItem=%204836&ctNode=31306&mp=epa, 2016/6/13
李翠萍(2012)。褐地重建政策分析-社區能力的觀點。台北:五南出版社。
林志樑,2014<生活中低濃度鉛暴露與一般民眾的健康傷害>,綠十字健康網, http://www.greencross.org.tw/enviroment/lead-exposure-and-health.htm, 2014/1/23
范玫芳(2014)。風險管制與程序正義:風力發電機設置爭議。民主與治理。1(2),59-81。

被引用紀錄


黃則鳴(2017)。臺灣核廢料政策之論述分析—2011年至2016年〔碩士論文,國立臺灣大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU201704409

延伸閱讀