透過您的圖書館登入
IP:3.21.104.109
  • 期刊
  • OpenAccess

臺灣行政法人制度推動歷程的歷史制度分析

A Historical Institutional Analysis of the Development of Non-Departmental Public Bodies in Taiwan

摘要


行政院為進行政府組織改造,自2002年開始推動行政法人制度。行政法人的設置,可視為政府治理與公共服務遞送模式選擇更加多元化的制度變遷。在2000年民進黨首次執政時,行政法人的推動工作尤其困難,但到國民黨執政時轉為順暢。本文以歷史制度論為研究途徑,藉由文獻與次級資料分析,探討關於行政法人制度「常」與「變」的兩個問題:其一,在該制度的推動過程中,為何會有路徑依賴的現象?其二,在民進黨執政時的第五屆立法院,以及國民黨執政時的第七、八屆立法院,在這兩個關鍵時刻為何會發生制度變遷?對此,本文從「結構」、「行動者」這兩個面向來提出解釋。其中,結構的部分,從分立政府或一致政府,以及政府改造的政治氛圍來分析;行動者方面,則聚焦於探討組織成員、立法院、主管機關之間的互動。本文有助於理解臺灣行政法人制度過去的推動經驗,以供未來借鏡。

並列摘要


In order to promote reform of government organizations, the Executive Yuan established the system of non-departmental public bodies (NDPBs) in 2002. The establishment of NDPBs can be viewed as a systematic change promoting more diversified governance modes and public service delivery. During the first Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) administration, the promotion of NDPBs was particularly difficult. However, the task became easier after the Kuomintang (KMT) returned to power. This article adopts a historical institutionalist research approach, analyzing the literature and secondary data to explore the issues of "continuity" and "change" in NDPBs. First, why does path dependence occur in the process of institutional reform? Second, why did the institutional change occur at two critical junctures during the fifth Legislative Yuan under the DPP administration, and the seventh and eighth Legislative Yuan under the KMT administration? The article proposes an explanation on the dimensions of "structure" and "actors." The analysis of "structure" is about divided governments or unified governments, as well as the political climate for government reform. The analysis of "actors" focuses on the interactions between organization members, the Legislative Yuan, and the competent authorities. The article contributes to the understanding of Taiwan's experiences in promoting NDPBs and is useful for future reference.

參考文獻


王光旭、史美強,2016, 〈行政院組織再造之歷史制度分析:1987-2012〉,王業立、傅恆德、宋興洲(編),《臺灣政經轉型下之制度變遷》,臺北:獨立作家,頁285-330。Wang, Guang-xu & Mei-chiang Shih. 2016. “Hangzhengyuan zuzhizaizao zhi lishizhidu fenxi: 1987-2012” [A Historical Institutionalism Analysis of the Executive Yuan’s reorganization in Taiwan (1987-2012)]. In Taiwan zhengjing zhuanxing xia zhi zhidu bianqian [The Institutional Changes Under the Transition of the Politics and the Economy in Taiwan], eds. Wang, Yeh-lih, Hung-der Fu, & Hsing-chou Sung. Taipei: Independent Writers Publishing Inc., 285-330.
王卓聖、鄭讚源,2012 , 〈臺灣長期照顧制度上發展脈絡及借鑒一歷史制度論〉,《社會科學學報》,19: 90-125。Wang, Cho-sheng & Tsan-yuang Cheng. 2012. “Taiwan zhangqi zhaogu zhi zhidu zhi fazhan mailuo- Lishizhidulun” [Long-term Care Institution of Context in Taiwan and of References in OECD Historical Institutionalism]. Journal of Social Science 19: 90-125.
王崇斌,2007,《政策推動體制與公共組織變革之研究:兼論臺灣行政法人化政策推動》,臺北:臺灣大學政治學研究所博士論文。Wang, Chung-pin. 2007. Zhengce tuidong tizhi yu gonggong zuzhi biange zhi yanjiu: Jianlun taiwan hangzhengfarenhua zhengce tuidong [Policy Promotion Regime and Public Organizational Change: The Case Study of the Administrative Corporation Policy in Taiwan]. Doctoral dissertation, Department of Political Science, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.
王啟清,1993, 〈中科院財團法人化浮出檯面〉,《經濟日報》,7/24,12。Wang, Chi-ching. 1993. “Zhongkeyuan caituanfarenhua fuchutaimian” [The Transformation of the NCSIST to GONGO has Come to the Fore]. Economics Daily News July 24, sec. 12.
王躍生,1997,《新制度主義》,臺北:揚智。Wang, Yue-sheng. 1997. Xinzhiduzhuyi [New Institutionalism]. Taipei: Yang-Chih Book Co., Ltd.

延伸閱讀