透過您的圖書館登入
IP:3.15.202.4
  • 期刊
  • OpenAccess

我國人事行政機關體制之改進途徑

The Reform Approaches of the Structures of Personnel Organization in the Republic of China

摘要


依據我國憲法,現行人事機關體制係:(一)人事權(人事機關)獨立於行政權(行政機關)之外、(二)人事機關及其分支機構自成一條鞭系統。惟行憲以來,此一體制是否適切,仍多探討者。憲法學者與人事行政學者的看法互有不同,其癥結仍在所謂「考試權」是否僅宜涉及考選及銓定資格?或應如憲法規範之廣義人事權?本篇首在說明各種論點,並自人事行政學立場申述考銓行政範疇及其獨立方式的各國實例,進而敘述修改憲法第八章「考試」諸條文的基本原則與方案,亦提出行政機關(行政院)需設置所屬人事幕僚機關的必要性與改制方式。在憲法第八章未修改前,如何維護考試院與行政院處理人事施政之密切關係,仍為主要課題,故如何改善考銓機構與行政院人事幕僚機構之關係(如授權管理方式),值得重視。

並列摘要


Based upon the Charpter 8 ”Examination” of the Constitution of the Republic of China, the contemporary Personnel Organization is an independent agency, which is not subordinate to the Administrative Branch. It has been stuies to some extents, since 1947. The main issue is: what is the scope of Examination Power (of Five Branches System). What is difference between Examination power and personnel power? In this article, we try to explore the differents theories and arguments of the mentioned above issues. We also examine the modern countries personnel system, particulary the ”staff-function” system, which is more feasible in those developed nations. We also point out the approaches to revise the Charpter 8 of the constitution. It is also strongly suggested that the team work relations between Examination Yuan and Executive Yuan should be strengthened.

被引用紀錄


黃守達(2015)。戰後台灣地方自治的轉型:法律史視角的考察〔碩士論文,國立臺灣大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU.2015.02638

延伸閱讀