基於citespace比較分析中國大陸和美國公共政策研究現狀及趨勢

Comparative Analysis of Public Policy Research at between Mainland of China and United States based on Citespace

黃紫晗(ZiHan Huang)

《中國行政評論》 25卷2期 (2019/06) Pp. 57-78

https://doi.org/10.6635/cpar.201906_25(2).0003

摘要

本文以兩地高級別期刊論文（大陸CSSCI1172篇和美國SSCI1768篇）為樣本，採用文獻計量法和知識可視化分析工具citespace，對兩地公共政策研究的現狀、熱點及演化等進行深入和交互分析。結果表明，大陸在研究公共政策方面還比較偏向於傳統的理論和宏觀政策研究，美國卻更加聚焦在實務和微觀層面政策研究。在研究內容方面，美國的公共政策研究議題廣，特別是涉及少數族裔人群和跨領域的研究，大陸的公共政策研究聚焦於傳統的政策過程研究和經濟領域政策研究。從研究合作網絡情況來看，中國大陸方面，作者和研究機構之間的學術聯繫較弱，美國卻相反，作者與機構之間的聯繫多。在研究熱點方面，美國主要集中在政治、消費者、能源等方面，而大陸集中在政策制定、合法性、經濟產業等。新的研究前言方面，美国是政策資源、民眾情緒和政策合法化等，大陸是在開拓民主渠道、監督機制和推動政策民主科學化等方面。

關鍵字

公共政策 ； 知識譜圖 ； 研究現狀 ； 研究趨勢 ； citespace

並列摘要

This paper takes the high-level journal papers of the two databases (CSSCI/1172 and SSCI/1768) as a sample, using the bibliometrics and citespace to conduct in-depth and interactive analysis of the status quo, hotspots and evolution of public policy research between the two places. The results show that mainland of China is more inclined to traditional theoretical and macro-policy research, while the United States has focused more on policy research at the substantive and micro level. In terms of research content, there are a wider range of research topics in the United States, especially those involving ethnic minority groups and cross-disciplinary research. while mainland focuses on traditional policy process research and economic field policy research, The academic links between authors and research institutions are weak in mainland, while in the United States, there are more connections and cooperation between institutions and authors. In terms of research hotspots, the United States mainly focuses on politics, consumers, and energy, while policy formulation, legitimacy, and economic industries are common in mainland. The new frontiers of research are policy resources, public sentiment, and legalization of policies in the United States, while development of democratic channels, supervision mechanisms and the promotion of scientific and democratic policies are the trends in mainland.

並列關鍵字

Public Policy ； Knowledge Map ； Current Research ； Research trends ； Citespace

參考文獻

Boucraert,Geert .2010. “Research in Public Administration for the futrure.” Society and Economy,32 (2010) 1, pp. 3–15 DOI:10.1556/SocEc.32.2010.1.2

Giest, Sarah. 2017. “Big data for policymaking: fad or fasttrack?” .Policy Sci (2017),50:367-382. DOI 10.1007/s11077-017-9293-1

Silva,A.J.Prado,V.Alcantara,D.Tonelli&J.R.Pereira.2018.“Public opinion: Bibliometric Analysis for the systematization of trends”. SILVA ET AL. (2018) ,pp.2-30, DOI: 10.15628/holos.2018.6905

毛梅鑫，李自力，吳彤，曾利，2018，<基於Citespace的國內公共政策研究現狀分析>，《國防科技》，39(1)：95-103

王飛，2008，<公共政策合法化：來難怪中國主體的博弈>，《理論導刊》2008年8月：35-37