- 期刊
閩南族群之他稱族名「Hoklo／Hohlo」的漢字名書寫形式與變遷：從歷史文獻與地圖地名的檢索來分析
The Chinese Writing Forms and Changes of the Minnan Ethnic Group Name ＂Hoklo/Hohlo＂: An Analysis of Historical Archives and Map Place Names
摘要
本文從文獻檢索與地圖地名兩個面向切入，希望發掘指稱閩南族群之他稱族名Hoklo／Hohlo漢字名（河老、貉獠∕䝤、貉老、鶴老∕佬、學老∕佬、福老∕佬、河洛）用詞的起源、變遷、使用年代與頻率，發掘更有力的論證，以突破過去在這方面議題探討的視野侷限性。研究發現，這些稱呼似乎都是來自以音套字（音名），且很可能來自客家族群對閩南族群的他稱用法。這些「地圖地名」只出現在廣東，不見於臺、閩。其中數量最多的是「學老」地名；其次為「鶴老」，未見「河老」與「河洛」地名。「Hoklo／Hohlo」的漢字名中，最早出現的是河老與貉獠，貉老與鶴老可能稍晚一些；再來為學老，再次為福老。鶴佬、學佬與福佬出現最晚，廣泛被認知應在19世紀末到20世紀初。本文推測新竹地區閩南人的「Hohlo lang」自稱用法，應是受粵東移民裔用法的影響。及至今日，「Hohlo」（音名）與「福佬」（漢字名）已經成為臺灣閩南族群的慣用稱呼了。
並列摘要
This paper searches through the literatures and map names, and explores the origin, change, using period and frequency of the Chinese writing forms and changes of the Minnan ethnic group name 'Hoklo / Hohlo' from other ethnic groups. We also want to explore more powerful arguments to break through the limitations of the past in this issue. The findings of this study are as follows: these Chinese writing forms all seem to originate from the 'sound name', and mainly from the Hakka ethnic group. The study also found that these 'map names' only appeared in Guangdong, and not in Taiwan or Fujian. Most map names are 'Xuelao (學老)', and then 'Helao (鶴老)', but we could not find 'Helao (河老)' or 'Heluo (河洛)'. In these Chinese writing forms, the earliest appearing are 'Helao (河老)' and 'Helao (貉獠)'; the second earliest forms are 'Helao (貉老)' and 'Helao (鶴老)'; the third is 'Xuelao (學老)'; and later 'Fulao (福老)' appeared. The final forms that appeared are 'Helao (鶴佬)', 'Xuelao (學佬)' and 'Fulao (福佬)'. They were widely recognized in the late 19th and early 20th centuries. This paper also speculates that self-proclaimed ('Hohlo lang') usage of the Minnan ethnic group in Hsinchu, should be influenced by the usage of emigrants in eastern Guangdong. And today, 'Hohlo' (sound name) and 'Fulao (福佬)' (Chinese name) become the customary names of Taiwan's Minnan ethnic group.
參考文獻
延伸閱讀
- 曹逢甫、劉秀雪（2001）。閩南語小稱詞的由來－兼談歷史演變與地理分布的關係。聲韻論叢，(11)，295-310。https://doi.org/10.29753/CP.200110.0016
- 曹逢甫、石曉娉（2009）。臺灣閩南語“仔”前變調的趨同變化－社會語言學及音韻學的調查。漢學研究，27(1)，299-329。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=02544466-200903-27-1-299-329-a
- 林美容（2010）。跨文化民俗書寫的角色變化－佐倉孫三《閩風雜記》與《臺風雜記》的比較。漢學研究，28(4)，261-294。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=02544466-201012-201103110036-201103110036-261-294
- 阮蘇蘭、阮大瞿越（2019）。Analyses of the Transmission of the Jing Language through Nôm Characters from the Perspective of Language Situation of the Jing People in Dongxing, Guangxi, China。中正漢學研究，(33)，171-190。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=1996269X-201906-201908140007-201908140007-171-190
- 邢義田（1985）。＂China＂ in the Writings of Ancient Rome: Critical and Complementary Notes on the Sections of Han-Rome Relations in Chang Hsing-lang's The Materials for a History of Sino-Foreign Relations, Vol. I。食貨月刊，14(11&12)，523-534。https://doi.org/10.6435/SHM.198503.0523