透過您的圖書館登入
IP:3.144.187.103
  • 期刊

論管輅在「正始學術」新變中之地位-兼述其《易》論、方伎之預測鑑誡的應世智慧

Discussions on Guanlu's Position in the Zhengshin Theory-Also on His Political Wisdom in Predictions and Commandments by Using Yi Divination and Occultism

摘要


曹魏齊王芳「正始」年間,重用浮華之士,陰奪司馬懿之權,頓使政治氣氛變得詭譎。而學術方面亦呈現新變,世所豔稱的「正始之音」,時有大型談座,自由議論,溝通儒道成了當時學術之最核心議題。管輅躬逢此學術的鉅大轉折期,仍沿循漢代象數易的軌跡,益以陰陽、方伎,而自成「數術易」一系,援之與正始玄談界之精英對辯。而世之論清談者,多忽略之,也未能正視其所談的《易》「義」及「術數」之「理」,遂流失此脈絡之學術系譜。本文貞定管輅之學術地位為「象數易」至「數術易」之轉折;以陰陽變化、五行符命「豎義」之正始清談地位;以《易》道「與變升降」為處易代之際的應世智慧;以「奇方異術」勸善導德,具教化之功,益見其學思的殊趣與本色。

關鍵字

管輅 方伎 術數 易占 正始學術

並列摘要


In Cao-Wei Zhengshi period, the atmosphere of idle talk is popular. All doctrines in Pre-Qin are openly discussed and developed. The academic core at that time is to communicate Confucianism and Taoism. In Yi researches, Heyan and Wangbi quote Laozhuang to lead to Yi, which is somewhat participation Hyun. Guanlu doesn't think it right to discuss only essence and discard shiangshu (象數). His Yi comes from the Pre-Qin to Han Dynasty plus Yin-yang, divination etc. and is included in the system of Shushushi (術數系).In the Zhengshi discussions, he doesn't focus on Being, Non-being or natural norm but on the changes of Yin Yang, the five elements and auspicious omens. But when it comes to academic idle talk, Guanlu is often overlooked. During the transference of Wei-Jin dynasty, he isn't involved in political storms and remains unharmed and respected owing to his Yi and being practical with the times. He shows those who are puzzled and hesitate a magnanimous way through unusual fortune-telling methods, thus being beneficial to common people. He is talented but not in an important position, which is a great pity to those who know him well. This essay is to analyze Guanlu's academic role and position he deserves in the Zhengshin theory.

並列關鍵字

Guanlu occultism shushu Yi divination Zhengshi theory

參考文獻


戰國莊周、清郭慶藩集釋(1987)。莊子集釋。臺北:華正書局。
漢王符、清汪繼培箋(1984)。潛夫論箋。臺北:大立出版社。
三國魏曹植、趙幼文(1985)。曹植集校注。臺北:明文書局。
晉陳壽南朝宋裴松之注(1980)。三國志。臺北=Taipei:鼎文書局=Ding-Wen Publishing House。
晉陳壽、盧弼集解(1958)。三國志集解。臺北:藝文印書館。

被引用紀錄


曲華曼(2015)。郭璞學術與晉代學風之關係〔碩士論文,國立臺灣大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU.2015.00621

延伸閱讀