歐盟因應中國大陸競爭威脅的新產業政策倡議：爭議源起與可能作為

On the Origin of EU-Level Industrial Policy: Nationalism or Destructive Innovation?

葉國俊(Kuo-Chun Yeh) ； 林雅淇(Ya-Chi Lin)

《歐美研究》 51卷3期 (2021/09) Pp. 495-556

https://doi.org/10.7015/JEAS.202109_51(3).0003

摘要

2019年似成為歐盟產業政策分水嶺：德、法先後發布「德國產業戰略2030」與「歐盟產業政策宣言」，歐洲議會通過外人投資審查機制。部分領導人深受「破壞性創新」影響，積極防範中國大陸於全球分工體系後來居上的獨占力。基於公共利益與國家安全，調整全球分工並整併重要部件產製倡議，雖與傳統競爭思維牴觸，但新冠疫情凸顯公衛產業匱乏似更強化其論述。在執委會堅定支持，以及WTO改革、歐美政策協調、歐中投資協議各界反應等皆不如預期下，或將成為不以單純成本效益決定的次佳政策。預期歐盟會就新產業政策凝聚共識，並在國家本位之間求取平衡。

關鍵字

歐盟產業政策 ； 中國大陸產業政策 ； 破壞性創新 ； 競爭政策 ； 外人投資監控機制

並列摘要

February 2019 was a watershed for EU industrial policy thanks to the ＂Franco-German Manifesto for a European Industrial Policy＂ and the EU Framework for FDI Screening. This paper reviews the relevant theories, history of EU-level industrial policy and recent comments on the above activities. We argue that ＂destructive innovation＂ rather than conventional industrial theory has had great impact on the decisions of EU Member States. That is, a strategy combining new technologies and components improves the price-performance ratio and allows firms in developing economies to catch up and compete with the products of advanced economies. In addition to commenting on nationalism, the EU DG Competition also critiques the Franco-German proposal as violating the policy tradition. However, the new EU-level industrial policy would surpass simple cost-benefit considerations if the WTO reform, EU-US relations, and EU-China bilateral negotiations are unsuccessful in the next few years.

並列關鍵字

EU industrial policy ； China's industrial policy ； destructive innovation ； competition policy ； FDI screening mechanism

參考文獻

葉國俊、林展暉 (2019)。〈歐盟建立外資併購監控機制分析：歐中雙邊爭議與挑戰〉，《問題與研究》，58, 3: 1-50。(Yeh, K.-C., & Lin, C.-H. [2019]. The origins of the EU-level FDI screening mechanism: Conflicts of the EU-China industry policies and the challenges. Wenti Yu Yanjiu, 58, 3: 1-50.) https://doi.org/ 10.30390/ISC.201909_58(3).0001

Autor, D. H., Dorn, D., & Hanson, G. H. (2013). The China syndrome: Local labor market effects of import competition in the United States. American Economic Review, 103, 6: 2121-2168. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.103.6.2121

Autor, D. H., Dorn, D., & Hanson, G. H. (2016). The China shock: Learning from labor market adjustment to large changes in trade. Annual Review of Economics, 8, 1: 205-240. https://doi.org/ 10.1146/annurev-economics-080315-015041

Bartelme, D. G., Costinot, A., Donaldson, D., & Rodríguez-Clare, A. (2019). The textbook case for industrial policy: Theory meets data (NBER Working Paper 26193). National Bureau of Economic Research. https://doi.org/10.3386/w26193

Barwick, P. J., Kalouptsidi, M., & Zahur, N. B. (2019). China’s industrial policy: An empirical evaluation (NBER Working Paper 26075). National Bureau of Economic Research. https://doi.org/ 10.3386/w26075