透過您的圖書館登入
IP:18.224.214.215
  • 期刊

去滅絕:一個過早的主張

De-Extinction: A Premature Claim

摘要


將滅絕物種重新帶回這個世界,是復活生物學企圖執行的工作。而隨著近年來基因編輯技術的快速發展,去滅絕的研究也逐步從科幻層級提昇到了所謂的科學事實層級。然而,這樣的科學實踐,到底呈現了什麼?是科學家真的讓已滅絕物種復活了?還是聲稱去滅絕已成功,只是一個過早(premature)的主張?本文企圖從「滅絕」與「去滅絕」的定義,以及「物種成員」與「物種本身」所涉及的概念區分著手,論證聲稱去滅絕已成功,是一個仍有待商確的主張。而此論證的核心觀點為,斷定科學家對已滅絕物種的複製(clone)是否屬於或者不屬於已滅絕物種,並無法決定科學家是否真的讓已滅絕物種復活。

並列摘要


Resurrection biology aims to bring extinct species back to life. With the rapid development of gene-editing technologies in recent years, the idea of de-extinction has gradually been recognized as a potentially realizable scientific goal rather than residing in the realm of science fiction. What might de-extinction mean? Will it entail scientists actually reviving extinct species, or is the notion as yet premature? This paper argues that de-extinction is as yet not possible given the definitions of extinction and de-extinction, and the distinction between species taxa and species categories. The central argument is that the judgment of whether or not a cloned organism properly belongs to an extinct species will not be the determining factor in whether or not scientists successfully revive extinct species.

參考文獻


Beever, J. (2017). The ontology of species: Commentary on Kasperbauer’s ‘should we bring back the passenger pigeon? The ethics of de-extinction.’ Ethics, Policy & Environment, 20, 1: 18-20. https://doi.org/10.1080/21550085.2017.1291825
Blockstein, D. E. (2017). We can’t bring back the passenger pigeon: The ethics of deception around de-extinction. Ethics, Policy & Environment, 20, 1: 33-37. https://doi.org/10.1080/21550085.2017.1291826
Campbell, D. (2016). A case for resurrecting lost species—Review essay of Beth Shapiro’s, “how to clone a mammoth: the science of de-extinction.” Biology & Philosophy, 31, 5: 747-759. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10539-016-9534-2
Crane, J. K. (2004). On the metaphysics of species. Philosophy of Science, 71, 2: 156-173. https://doi.org/10.1086/383009
Delord, J. (2007). The nature of extinction. Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, 38, 3: 656-667. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsc.2007.06.004

被引用紀錄


歐陽敏(2022)。解消「物種問題」:一個反實在論的零售論證歐美研究52(4),613-653。https://doi.org/10.7015/JEAS.202212_52(4).0002

延伸閱讀