並列摘要
Intuitionally, we might agree that acting imprudently is irrational. That is to say, reason does not permit us to sacrifice the future for the sake of the present. Anyway, can this intuition be justified? On the other hand, is it always rational to sacrifice the present for the sake of the future? In case of conflict between the present and future desires, which one are we to fulfil, if we are rational? I an going to provide solutions for the above questions by distinguishing between various categories of desires and by illustrating their different characteristics.
參考文獻
Brandt, R. B.(1979).A Theory of the Good and the Right.
Gosling, J. C. B.(1969).Pleasure and Desire.
R. M.Hare,Hare(1981).Moral Thinking: Its Levels, Method and Point.
Nagel, Thomas(1970).The Possibility of Altruism.
Schiffer, Stephen(1976).American Philosophical Quarterly.
延伸閱讀
- 鄭丞傑、金琳（2004）。性欲。健康世界，(224)，66-66。https://doi.org/10.6454/HW.200408.0066
- 馮冬（2011）。「慾望那可怕的光輝」：葉慈詩歌的心理解析。文山評論：文學與文化，5(1)，121-144。https://doi.org/10.30395/WSR.201112_5(1).0006
- 林建中（2009）。慾望機器〔碩士論文，國立臺灣師範大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0021-1610201315174066
- 伍至學（2017）。Ontical Nature and Destiny of Being。生命教育研究，9(2)，41-52。https://doi.org/10.3966/207466012017120902003
- 思凱（2002）。Withdrawal。諮商與輔導，(203)，21-21。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=a0000014-200211-x-203-21-21-o