知識、思辨與感觸－試從中國哲學研究論牟宗三先生的方法論觀點

Textual Knowledge, Philosophical Thinking and Existential Correspondence: On the Methodology of Professor Mou Tsung-san

鄭宗義(Chung-Yi Cheng)

《鵝湖學誌》 18期 (1997/06) Pp. 23-52

https://doi.org/10.29653/LS.199706.0002

摘要

雖然中國哲學研究並不足以代表牟宗三先生學問思想的全幅內容，但卻不可否認是其中極具核心的部分。牟先生雖很少論及自己對傳統中國哲學的理解方法。不過零散的演講稿及專書的自序文字中，我們仍不難發現他是有始終一貫的方法論觀點的。他認爲要恰當理解中國哲學，必須兼備知識、思辨與感觸三個條件。本文的工作是試圖借取現代西方解釋學的視角來重建抉發牟先生的方法論觀點。

關鍵字

知識 ； 思辨 ； 感觸 ； 理性之認知 ； 歷史性之認知 ； 解釋學的循環 ； 偏見

並列摘要

As is well known, Professor Mou Tsung-san was the remarkable philosopher on the reconstruction of Chinese Philosophy in the modern era. Although Professor Mou less articulated his methodology, it still not difficult to find out his ideas through some literal transcripts of his lectures and prefaces of his books. According to him, an objective and appropriate understanding of Chinese Philosophy based on three interrelated conditions: textual knowledge, philosophical thinking and the most important one, existential correspondence. The aim of this paper is try to give on overall vision of Professor Mou's methodology in the light of modern philosophical hermeneutics.

並列關鍵字

textual knowledge ； Philosophical thinking ； existential correspondence ； rational cognition ； historical cognition hermeneutic circle ； prejudice

參考文獻

Donald, G.(1994).Ttuth and Method.

Hans GeorgGadamer,Gadamer(1994).Truth and Method.

Hans-GeorgGadamer,Gadamer(1994).哲學解釋學.

Gadamer, Hans-George(1976).Philosophical Hermeneutics.

Richard E., Richard, E. R.Palmer,Palmer(1969).Hermeneutics：Interpretation Theory in Schleiermacher, Dilthey, Heidegger and Gadamer.