論蘇軾《易》與王弼《易》、伊川《易》之異同

A Comparative Study on Su Shi’s, Wang Bi’s and Cheng Yi’s Commentaries on the Yijing

楊自平(Tzu-Ping Yang)

《中國學術年刊》 38_1期 (2016/03) Pp. 1-25

https://doi.org/10.6238/SIS.201603.01

摘要

學界對蘇軾《易》已有相當多的研究，然對蘇軾《易》與王弼《易》、伊川《易》作深入比較者較少。故分別從論《易》的定位及卦爻關係、論象數、論卦變與卦主、義理釋《易》四方面，比較三子說法之異同，藉以彰顯蘇軾《易》學的特色，又可為《易》學史明確指出三子《易》學鮮明的差異。蘇軾在卦、爻辭關係及《易》數議題有其獨特見解，對卦變的論法與伊川相同，且亦重視卦主，義理立場近於老莊。既承繼王弼《易》學，又有所開展，雖與伊川皆重視人事之理，但明顯異於伊川鮮明的儒學色彩。無論在卦、爻辭的解釋或《易》學哲學都有其獨特處。

關鍵字

蘇軾 ； 《東坡易傳》 ； 王弼 ； 伊川 ； 《易》學

並列摘要

Although there are lots of studies on Su Shi's Yijing, only few of them focus on comparing Su Shi's, Wang Bi's and Cheng Yi's Yijing. This essay will focus on the orientation of Yijing and the relationship between Yao（爻）and Gua（卦）, the image-number system, hexagram alternation and Gua zhu, interpretation of the Yijing based on the reasons respectively. With this in mind, the essay will compare Su’s, Wang’s and Cheng’s studies, and carry out the characteristics of Su’s Yijing Learning, which contributes to the history of Yijing Learning. Su’s insight consists in his unique interpretations of the relationship between Yao and Gua and the number system. Su’s opinion on hexagram alternation is the same as Cheng Yi’s, they attach great importance to Gua zhu. However, Su's position about reasons is similar to Laozi（老子） and Zhuang Zhou（莊周）. Although Su inherits Wang Bi's Yijing Learning, he develops his own way of interpretation. Su and Cheng Yi both accentuate the importance of using the principles of human affairs in interpreting the Yijing. However, Cheng’s interpretation carries his own distinct Confucian characteristic. We could conclude that Su’s interpretation of Gua and Yao or his philosophy of Yijing Learning has a system of his own.

並列關鍵字

Su Shi ； Dongpoyizhuan ； Wang Bi ； Cheng Yi ； Yijing Learning

參考文獻

鄧秀梅：〈《東坡易傳》釋易方法與義理分析〉，《東海中文學報》第 24 期（2012 年 7 月），頁 115-146。【Teng, Hsiu-mei (2012). Dong po yi zhuan shi yi fang fa yu yi li fen xi (The Interpretive Methods and Theoretical Analysis of the Dongpo Yi Zhuan). Tunghai Journal of Chinese Literature, 24, PP.115-138.】

魏‧王弼、晉‧韓康伯：《周易王韓注》（臺北：大安出版社，1999 年）。Wang, Bi and Han, Kang-bo(1999). Zhou yi wang han zhu ( Annotations about Zhouyi by Wang, Bi and Han, Kang-bo). Taipei:Daan.】

宋‧丁易東：《大衍索隱》，《景印文淵閣四庫全書》第 806 冊（臺北：臺灣商務印書館，1983-1986年）。Ding, Yu-dong(1983-1986). Da yan suo yin (The Index of the Dayan). Taipei: The Commercial Press

宋‧吳仁傑：《易圖說》，《通志堂經解》第 1 冊（揚州：江蘇廣陵古籍刻印社，1996 年）。【Wu,Ren-jie(1996). Yi tu shuo (The Caption of Change). Yangzhou: Jiangsu Guangling Guji Keyinshe.】

宋‧程頤：《易傳》，《二程集》第 2 冊（臺北：漢京文化事業有限公司，1983 年）。【Cheng, Yi(1983). Yi zhuan (Biography of Change). Taipei: Hanjing.】