以資源基礎觀點及動態能耐觀點檢視不同情境下廠商獲取競爭優勢的策略

Examining Firms' Strategies for Competitive Advantages through Resource-based View and Dynamic Capability View under Different Environments

蔡政安(Cheng-An Tsai) ； 廖明坤(Ming-Kung Liao)

《管理評論》 35卷1期 (2016/01) Pp. 47-72

https://doi.org/10.6656/MR.2016.35.1.CHI.47

摘要

策略管理的核心問題是廠商如何達成並保持競爭優勢。資源基礎觀點源自李嘉圖觀點，認為廠商擁有特殊資源可以獲取競爭優勢；動態能耐觀點耐植基於熊彼得觀點，認為廠商能夠快速回應環境變化以重組特殊資源的能耐才具有競爭優勢。資源基礎與動態能耐觀點常被形容是「姊妹」，有時被認為是相互競爭，有時又被認為是互補；在策略理論的應用中，釐清兩者的環境適用條件及理解兩者間的關係是一個重要的議題。本研究把環境情境區分為技術創新性(能耐強化式v.s.能耐毀滅式)與市場變化性(靜態市場v.s.動態市場)，採用多重個案研究設計，以資源基礎觀點及動態能耐觀點檢視在不同環境下，廠商獲取競爭優的策略。本研究發現：廠商進入能耐強化式的技術創新領域及靜態市場時，是偏向資源基礎觀點的策略；廠商進入能耐毀滅式的技術創新領域或動態市場時，是偏向以動態能耐觀點的策略來發展其競爭優勢，並進一步演繹出有兩種不同類型動態能耐策略。並得出資源基礎與動態能耐此兩觀點間是為互補之結論。

關鍵字

資源基礎 ； 動態能耐 ； 環境變化 ； 個案研究

並列摘要

The fundamental question in the field of strategic management is how firms achieve and sustain competitive advantage. Rooted on Ricardian perspective, resource-based view advocates firms to accumulate heterogeneous resources for competitive advantages. Rooted on Schumpeterian perspective, dynamic-capability view suggests firms to redeploy unique resources and competences to quickly respond to environmental change for competitive advantages. While the resource based view and the dynamic capability approach are often portrayed as sister theories, they sometimes cited as a competing theory or as complementarytheory with respect to the others. For application of strategic management, the important issues are to clarify the applied environment and the interaction of each other. Therefore, this article divides environment into technological innovation (competenceenhanced vs. competence-destroyed) and market changes (static market vs dynamic market). Through conducting multiple case-studies, this article analyzes firms' strategic behavior to obtain competitive advantage in different environmental contexts. This research finds that when entering the context of competence-enhancing innovation and static market, firm prefers to resource-based view for developing competitive advantages; when entering the context of changed technology or market, firm prefers to dynamic-capability view for developing competitive advantages. This research further induces two different types of dynamic-capability strategy and concludes that two strategic views complement each other.

並列關鍵字

Resource-Based View ； Dynamic-Capability View ； Environmental Change ； Case-Study

參考文獻

方世杰、黃美卿、邱志芳(2010)。連鎖事業體系動態能耐之建構：組織知識交換觀點之實證研究。商略學報。2(1)，1-19。

洪世章、譚丹琪、廖曉青(2007)。企業成長、策略選擇與策略改變。中山管理評論。15(1)，11-35。

曾真真、何雍慶(2005)。以資源基礎觀點及動態能力觀點檢視企業購決策及併購績效－以金融整合為例。管理評論。24(3)，95-116。

Afuah, Allan(1998).Innovation Management: Strategies, Implementation and Profits.Oxford University Press, Inc.

Afuah, Allan(2000).How Much do Your Co-opetitors' Capabilities Matter in the Face of a Technological Change?.Strategic Management Journal.21(3),387-404.