Restructuring the Manufacturing Industry during the Industry 4.0 Transition

Chu-Chi Kuo ； Joseph Z. Shyu

《管理評論》 37卷3期 (2018/07) Pp. 91-103

https://doi.org/10.6656/MR.201807_37(3).ENG091

摘要

The proliferation of Industry 4.0 technology has changed the structure of major industries and has become the core tenet of industrial revitalization and improvement. Based on the comprehensive deployment of physical information systems and the Internet of Things, the German government's Industry 4.0 program employs a computerized, digitalized, and intelligence-optimized business operations model. Elsewhere, the Advanced Manufacturing Partner program of the United States, Made in China 2025, and Taiwan Productivity 4.0 are leading-edge manufacturing programs. Based on a policy analysis model, this study constructed a competitive strategy for the manufacturing industry to implement during the Industry 4.0 transition, and analyzed the revitalization policy objectives of the manufacturing industries of Germany, the United States, China, and Taiwan in light of the revitalization policy objectives of the manufacturing industry and locus of industrial leadership. Based on the survey of Industrial Innovation Resources under the Industry 4.0 transition and the views of manufacturing experts, this paper examines and summarizes the key success factors of the manufacturing industry and a country's manufacturing innovation strategy during the Industry 4.0 transition. These key success factors could serve as a reference to aid governments in the development of revitalization policies for the manufacturing industry. The preliminary results indicated that economic, technological, and social development are policy mainstays in Germany with the locus of industrial leadership at the national, industrial, and enterprise levels during the Industry 4.0 transition. Meanwhile, policy in the United States is centered on economic and technological development, and the locus of industrial leadership is at the industry and enterprise levels. China's policy focuses on political, economic, technological, and social development, and the locus of industrial leadership is at the national level. Finally, Taiwan bases its policy on economic and technological development, and the locus of industrial leadership is at the national, industrial, and enterprise levels.

關鍵字

Industry 4.0 ； Policy Analysis Model ； Industry Revitalization ； Industrial Innovation Resources

參考文獻

王怡惠(2015),從工業 4.0 看我國生產力4.0 之挑戰」,臺灣經濟研究月刊,第38 卷,第8期, 頁111-119。

王振寰(2007),「從科技追趕到創新的經濟轉型:南韓、台灣與中國」,台灣社會研究季刊,第 68 期(12 月),頁 177-226。

任宇(2015),「中國與主要發達國家智慧製造的比較研究」,工業經濟論壇,第2卷,第2期, 頁68-76。

行政院科技辦公室(2015),「行政院生產力4.0發展方案」,(取得日期: 2015年9月17日),[available at http://archives.ey.gov.tw/Upload/WebArchive/01ey/20160110/www.ey.gov.tw/News_Contentd 725.html] «

宋天虎(1999),「先進製造技術的發展與未來」,機器人技術與應用,第01期(1月),頁 6-8。