跳出妒恨的認同政治，進入解放的培力政治―串聯尼釆和工運（或社運）的嘗試思考

Out of Ressentiment and Into Empowerment: Nietzsche and the Labor Question

趙剛(Kang Chao)

《台灣社會研究季刊》 30期 (1998/06) Pp. 117-161

https://doi.org/10.29816/TARQSS.199806.0004

摘要

勞工問題一定得陷在工具主義政治的條框中嗎？我不以為然。為什廢勞工不能也成為激進地改變這個世界的一個主角呢？假如這個問題不被排除的話，那麼如何可能呢？針對這些問題，尼采提供了豐富的對話基礎。他對於現代性、集體、與妒恨政治的批判，以及他對一種以激進美學教育為核心的個人自我教育計畫的提出，很可以幫助工運反省自身的目的（與手段）問題。儘管尼采對於社會性的輕視不是沒有問題，但是尼采對那些將個體性化約到社會性的計畫的批判，對於任何認真於培力政治和轉化政治的人而言，則是不能不面對的。

關鍵字

妒恨 ； 培力 ； 尼采 ； 工運 ； 激進教育 ； 現代性 ； 個體性

並列摘要

This paper problematizes the prevailing instrumentalist conception of labor movement by bringing the labor question into the purview of empowerment politics. This paper holds that Nietzsche's critique of modernity should provide rich resources for labor movement to reflect upon its goals and means. An aesthetically mediated radical self-education project is vital for individual workers (and, for this matter, social movement participants) to break the institutionalized routines and the unreflected binding norms on which captialism and the power that be rely. Despite Nietzsche's downright contempt for the social-which is highly problematic too, the Nietzschean caveat is precisely the irreducibility of the individual to the soical.

並列關鍵字

ressentiment ； empowerment ； Nietzsche ； labor movement ； radical education ； modernity ； individuality

參考文獻

Adorno, Theodor W.(1973).Negative Dialectics.New York:Continuum.

Adorno, Theodor, Horkheimer, Max(1979).Dialectic of Enlightenment.London:Verso.

Antonio, Robert J.(1995).Nietzsche's Antisociology: Subjectified Culture and the End of History.American Journal of Sociology.101(1)

Aschheim, Steven E.(1992).The Nietzsche Legacy in Germany 1890-1990.Berkeley:University of California Press.

Bell, Daniel(1978).The Cultural Contradictions of Capitalism.New York:Basic Books.