台灣版慢性病照護評估問卷之發展與驗證

Development and validation of the Taiwanese Version of the Assessment of Chronic Illness Care Questionnaire

黃紀諺(Chi-Yen Huang) ； 周盈邑(Ying-Yi Chou) ； 楊銘欽(Ming-Chin Yang) ； 董鈺琪(Yu-Chi Tung)

《台灣公共衛生雜誌》 40卷3期 (2021/06) Pp. 294-305

https://doi.org/10.6288/TJPH.202106_40(3).109098

摘要

目標：慢性病照護評估（Assessment of Chronic Illness Care, ACIC）問卷為國際上常用於評估醫療機構慢性病照護之品質或整合程度，但尚未使用於台灣，故本研究目的為翻譯慢性病照護評估問卷，並驗證台灣版ACIC問卷，作為測量台灣慢性病照護品質之評估工具。方法：依世界衛生組織建議之問卷發展流程進行問卷翻譯，我們於2019年7月至2020年2月之間完成ACIC問卷翻譯，郵寄ACIC問卷給56家診所之所有377位醫療人員，並以內容效度指標值（content validity index, CVI）、驗證性因素分析（confirmatory factor analysis, CFA）及Cronbach's α進行信效度檢定。結果：有效問卷共251份，回收率66.6％。經檢測專家效度全數題目之CVI均達0.8以上，刪除原量表其中13題後，配適度指標為0.89，卡方自由度比為1.78，標準化均方根殘差值為0.04，及近似均方根誤差為0.06，驗證性因素分析結果為一可接受之模型。內在一致性檢定之Cronbach's α值為0.897－0.946，顯示題目間有內在一致性。結論：21題台灣版ACIC問卷具有效度和信度，可以作為評估台灣慢性病照護品質的工具。

關鍵字

慢性病照護評估 ； 效度 ； 信度 ； 慢性病照護模式

並列摘要

Objectives: The Assessment of Chronic Illness Care (ACIC) questionnaire is widely used to assess the quality or integration of services in medical institutions. However, it has not yet been used in Taiwan. Thus, this study translated the ACIC questionnaire and validated the Taiwanese version of this questionnaire to measure the quality of chronic care in Taiwan. Methods: The translation process was based on the World Health Organization's ＂Process of Translation and Adaptation of Instruments.＂ We translated the ACIC questionnaire between July 2019 and February 2020 and distributed it by mail to 377 medical personnel employed at 56 clinics. The content validity index (CVI), confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), and Cronbach's α values were used to assess its reliability and validity. Results: The number of valid questionnaires returned was 251, and the response rate was 66.6%; the CVI was 0.8 or higher for all questions. After 13 items were eliminated, CFA revealed a favorable index of fit (0.89), with a chi-square to degree of freedom ratio, standardized root mean square residual, and root mean square error of approximation of= 1.78, 0.04, and 0.06, respectively. The Cronbach's α values (0.897-0.946) indicated acceptable internal consistency. Conclusions: The 21-item Taiwanese version of the ACIC questionnaire has satisfactory validity and reliability and can be used to evaluate the quality of chronic care in Taiwan.

並列關鍵字

assessment of chronic illness care ； validity ； reliability ； chronic care model

參考文獻

陳曉梅、曾勤媛、陳靜敏、紀珮君、葉芳枝：連續性照護量表之發展與信效度檢定—於老年慢性病患出院準備服務之運用。護理暨健康照護研究2013；9：261-70。doi:10.6225/JNHR.09.4.261。 Chem HM, Tzeng CY, Chen CM, Chi PC, Yeh FC. Validation and reliability testing of the patient continuity of care questionnaire in elderly with chronic diseases in Taiwan. J Nurs Healthc Res 2013;9:261-70. doi:10.6225/JNHR.09.4.261. [In Chinese: English abstract]

崔虹豔、胡平成、徐霜等：慢性病保健評估量表的漢化及條目評價。中南大學學報 2015；40：188-93。doi:10.11817/j.issn.1672-7347.2015.02.012。 Cui HY, Hu PC, Xu S, et al. Localization of the assessment of chronic ilness care and item evaluation. J Cent South Univ (Med Sci) 2015;40:188-93. doi:10.11817/j.issn.1672-7347.2015.02.012. [In Chinese: English abstract]

王勇、李華豔、孫玫等：湖南省基層醫療衛生機構醫務人員慢性病管理能力現狀調查。中國公共衛生 2016；32：1231-4。doi:10.11847/zgggws2016-32-09-25。 Wang Y, Li HY, Sun M, et al. Status of capacity for chronic disease management among medical staff in grass-roots heatlth care institutions in Hunan province. Chinese J Public Health 2016;32:1231-4. doi:10.11847/zgggws2016-32-09-25. [In Chinese: English abstract]

Marsh HW, Hocevar D. Application of confirmatory factor analysis to the study of self-concept: firstand higher order factor models and their invariance across groups. Psychol Bull 1985;97:562-82. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.97.3.562

Hu LT, Bentler PM. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct Equ Modeling 1999;6:1-55. doi:10.1080/10705519909540118