- 期刊
Clinical Applicability of Oscillometric Blood Pressure Measurement in Premature Infants in Comparison with Intra-arterial Measurement
動脈搏動描記器於早產兒血壓之臨床適用性與測量動脈血管內壓比較
摘要
The reliability of measuring of indirect blood pressure(BP) in premature infants was analyzed by comparing the oscillometric blood pressure reading on the arm with direct blood pressure reading from the umbilical catheters. Eight neonates, with a mean gestational age of 27.6±3 weeks and a mean birth body weight of 1045±363gm, were enrolled in the study. The systolc BP(SBP), diastolic BP(DBP), and mean BP(MBP) obtained by the two methods were analyzed. Although there was a significant correlation Between the pairs of readdings for SBP, DBP, and MBP(r=0.61,0.51,0.70 respecively, P＜0.004 for all); the 95%confidence intervals for individual measurements exceeded 20mmHg for SBP and DBP, and 15mmHg for MBP. We conclude that(1)for MBP, the discrepancy between the two methods may be clinically acceptable but there was a greater variability for SBP and DBP which may be unreliable, (2)the normative direct BP standards for newborns may not be a valid reference for indirect BP values, (3)cautious interpretations of oscillometric Bpvalues in critical and very low birth weight neonates is mandatory.
並列摘要
The reliability of measuring of indirect blood pressure(BP) in premature infants was analyzed by comparing the oscillometric blood pressure reading on the arm with direct blood pressure reading from the umbilical catheters. Eight neonates, with a mean gestational age of 27.6±3 weeks and a mean birth body weight of 1045±363gm, were enrolled in the study. The systolc BP(SBP), diastolic BP(DBP), and mean BP(MBP) obtained by the two methods were analyzed. Although there was a significant correlation Between the pairs of readdings for SBP, DBP, and MBP(r=0.61,0.51,0.70 respecively, P＜0.004 for all); the 95%confidence intervals for individual measurements exceeded 20mmHg for SBP and DBP, and 15mmHg for MBP. We conclude that(1)for MBP, the discrepancy between the two methods may be clinically acceptable but there was a greater variability for SBP and DBP which may be unreliable, (2)the normative direct BP standards for newborns may not be a valid reference for indirect BP values, (3)cautious interpretations of oscillometric Bpvalues in critical and very low birth weight neonates is mandatory.