透過您的圖書館登入
IP:3.12.71.237
  • 期刊

私募股權與公司經營績效:應募人類型與私募溢折價之影響

Operating Performance Following Private Placement of Equity: The Impact of Price Premiums, Discounts, and Investor Type

摘要


本研究主要在探討公司私募股權後之經營績效變化,實證結果發現私募股權公司其私募後經營績效有顯著的改善。分析應募人類型對經營績效的影響時,結果顯示內部人參與之私募,公司私募後經營績效較佳。本研究亦發現,私募公司不論是以折價或溢價發行,其私募後經營績效均有顯著的提升。此外,私募前虧損公司其私募後經營績效有顯著的改善,但私募前獲利公司則未能呈現顯著的成長。因此,本研究實證結果支持證券主管機關近期修法限制最近年度為稅後純益且無累積虧損之公司,原則上不宜以私募作為募集資金之途徑。此外,針對內部人參與之私募,分別就私募溢折價及私募前獲利或虧損探討其影響,結果發現不論公司是以溢價或折價發行股票或私募前呈現虧損狀況,內部人之參與均可提升或改善其私募後之經營績效。然而,當內部人參與私募前獲利之私募案時,則未發現公司經營績效有顯著提升。因此,本研究亦支持證券主管機關近期修法限制內部人不應參與最近年度為稅後純益且無累積虧損公司之私募案。額外測試顯示,即使內部人參與之私募折價大於20%,並不會損害公司股東之權益。

並列摘要


This study examines operating performance following private placement of equity. We find that after issuance, the operating performance of firms improves significantly. Further analysis by investor type indicates that this improvement is entirely due to investors who are insiders. We also find that when private equity is issued at a premium or discount, firms have better post-placement operating performance. Firms with losses prior to issuance increase their operating performance significantly, but firms with profits don't. This finding supports the private placement regulations amended by the Financial Supervisory Commission that do not allow a firm with a net profit and no accumulated deficit for the most recent fiscal year to privately issue equity. When private placement investors are insiders, firms have better post-placement operating performance regardless of whether firms issue at a premium or discount, or have losses prior to the issue. However, this is not the case for firms with profits prior to the issue. These results also support regulations that restrict insiders from participating in the private placement of equity of firms with a net profit and no accumulated deficit. Additional tests show that insiders may not reduce shareholders' wealth even if the price discount is over twenty percent per share of privately placed equity.

參考文獻


張琬喻、蔡明秀、郭一帆 (2010),「股權私募宣告效果與股權結構變動—以台灣上市上櫃公司為例」,《財務金融學刊》,第18卷第1期,91-136。
Anderson, R. C., and D. M. Reeb (2003), “Founding-Family Ownership and Firm Performance:Evidence from the S&P 500,” Journal of Finance, Vol. 58, No. 3, 1301-1328.
Barber, B. M., and J. D. Lyon (1996), “Detecting Abnormal Operating Performance: The Empirical Power and Specification of Test Statistics,” Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 41, No. 3, 359-399.
Barclay, M. J., C. G. Holderness, and D. P. Sheehan (2001), “The Block Pricing Puzzle,” Working Paper.
Barclay, M. J., C. G. Holderness, and D. P. Sheehan (2007), “Private Placements and Managerial Entrenchment,” Journal of Corporate Finance, Vol. 13, No. 4, 461-484.

被引用紀錄


謝家瑋(2015)。實施現股當日沖銷制度對臺灣股票市場品質之影響〔碩士論文,淡江大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6846/TKU.2015.00481
羅妏琦(2017)。臺灣上市櫃公司私募增資長期股價報酬與成長機會之關聯〔碩士論文,國立臺灣大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU201701283
楊嘉文(2016)。臺美日私募制度之比較研究-自交易關係人權益保障之角度觀察〔碩士論文,國立臺灣大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU201600352

延伸閱讀