透過您的圖書館登入
IP:216.73.216.122
  • 期刊

歐盟防治假訊息之策略與規範

The EU Strategy and Regulation on Disinformation

摘要


假訊息隨著人工智慧(artificial intelligence, AI)及數位科技的創新,網際網路與社群媒體的普遍使用,可以大量且迅速傳播。假訊息透過操縱公共輿論,足以影響投票行為、選舉結果或消費者購物選擇,妨害公民做出正確決定。嚴重時,假訊息甚至足以損害言論自由以及公共輿論,削弱對媒體或政府的信任,威脅民主機制及國家安全。鑑於假訊息對歐盟民主及價值的負面影響,歐洲聯盟(簡稱歐盟)自2018年起積極採取防治假訊息的策略與規範。本文目的是研析歐盟對抗假訊息主要策略、規範與措施等議題。本文並論證歐盟對抗假訊息策略如何在言論自由與假訊息規範之間取得平衡,在強化數位或網路訊息的透明性及課責機制之間,又如何確保媒體及訊息傳播的多元性,並確保歐盟民主與價值,數位科技與民主機制之正常發展等重要議題,凡此種種皆是本文的主要內容及問題意識。此等議題皆是歐盟防治假訊息的重要內容及挑戰,並值得參考借鑑。

並列摘要


Innovative artificial intelligence (AI) and digital technologies now allow disinformation to spread at unprecedented speed and in unparalleled volumes via the Internet and social media. Disinformation poses various critical challenges to democracy as it can be used to disrupt people's ability to make informed decisions, manipulate public opinion, affect election results, and disseminate hate and xenophobic speech. Since 2018, the European Union (EU) has acted to enhance regulations and its Code of Practice on disinformation. This paper examines the EU Strategy, laws and practices on disinformation. The EU's Digital Service Act and the 2022 Code of Practice on Disinformation are emerging as a new means of tackling disinformation. The EU model will introduce new transparency and accountability requirements for very large online platforms. It is expected that these measures will positively contribute to the protection of EU value, democracy, digital sovereignty and security. EU governance on disinformation provides important lessons and references for third countries.

參考文獻


Pontier, J.-M.,吳秦雯(譯)(2019).假新聞之控制.月旦法學雜誌.292,30-41.
林遠澤(2005).真理何為?—從哈伯瑪斯真理共識理論的實用轉向論真理的規範性涵義.歐美研究.35(2),363-404.
高玉泉(2001).歐盟有關網路內容管制之政策及原則.國立中正大學法學集刊.4,139-153.
翁燕菁(2019).言論的自由與責任:自歐洲人權法院近年爭議裁判反思.臺灣法學雜誌.363,5-11.
國家通訊傳播委員會,2022,〈數位中介服務法草案總說明〉,國家通訊傳播委員會:https://www.ncc.gov.tw/chinese/files/22062/5532_220629_1.pdf。2022/10/17。

延伸閱讀