透過您的圖書館登入
IP:3.147.66.178
  • 期刊

童詩集的表現形式

A Study on Expression Forms of Children's Poetry Collection

摘要


臺灣童詩並未在書市銷聲匿跡,卻被忽略已久。雖有詩人持續筆耕,出版童詩集仍屬不易,研究書目因此不足。是故,本論文分析中外童詩集的表現形式,探討書寫創意,並且審視臺灣近年來童詩集出版景況。以前言起始,本論文包括五節:(一)詩輯(二)寓言詩(三)詩繪本(四)童話詩(五)詩小說,最後為結論。本論文採擷中外經典與現代童詩,參酌出版趨勢,檢視童詩集中的圖文比例與關係,以及研究詩歌敘事成為寓言詩、詩繪本、童話詩與詩小說之樣貌。

關鍵字

童詩 寓言 繪本 童話 小說

並列摘要


Children's poetry in Taiwan has not disappeared in the book market, yet it remains insignificant. Though poets are persistent in poetry-making, it is not easy to publish a volume. Material for research is therefore insufficient to a great degree. This paper hence tries to explore the expression forms of children's poetry collection in order to probe into the creativity of writing, and to examine the publishing mode in recent Taiwan. Starting with Foreword, this paper consists of five parts, including (1) Poems into Collection, (2) Poems into Fable, (3) Poems into Fairytale, (4) Poems into Picture Book, (5) Poems into Novel, then ends with Conclusion. Looking into the classical and modern works with regard to the publishing facts, this paper aims to examine the weight and the connection between the text and the illustration in children's poetry collection. How the verses are developed into narrative, namely fable, picture book, fairytale and novel will also be explored.

並列關鍵字

Children's poetry fable picture book fairytale novel

參考文獻


李長青(2011)。海少年。高雄:高雄市文化局。
李進文(2013)。字然課。臺北:明日工作室。
林世仁(2014)。古靈精怪動物園。臺北:國語日報社。
(2010)。樹先生跑哪去了—童詩精選集。臺北:天下雜誌。
林良(2012)。我喜歡。臺北:國語日報社。

延伸閱讀


  • 黃基博(2016)。一首童詩的誕生竹蜻蜓.兒少文學與文化(2),345-383。https://doi.org/10.6738/bdclc.201606_(2).0011
  • 陳秀虹(2008)。添圖寫童詩的理論與應用國文天地(282),17-22。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=10159975-200811-201006280026-201006280026-17-22
  • 張素連(2003)。兒童詩歌教學活動設計國教世紀(205),59-62。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=17286441-200301-x-205-59-62-a
  • 王中林 (1991). A Comparative Study of Poems. 教學與研究, (13), 251-267. https://doi.org/10.6250/TR.1991.13.11
  • 切斯瓦夫·米沃什(1996)。Elements of Poetry傾向:文學人文季刊(7&8),32-33。https://doi.org/10.6490/TQ.199609.0032

國際替代計量