透過您的圖書館登入
IP:216.73.216.100
  • 期刊

聆聽學生的聲音:直接教學與問題導向學習教學策略之質性分析

Students' Perspectives: Direct and Problem Based Learning Teaching Strategies in Physical Education

摘要


從建構主義的觀點認為教師和學生對於體育課「教與學」的過程有不同的感受,同時亦認同學生觀點在學習過程裡佔有重要的角色。目的:本研究旨在透過學生對兩種教學策略的觀點進行探討,試圖瞭解學生對於不同教學策略之觀點。方法:本研究採質性研究法,以北臺灣一所專科二年級共44位學生為研究對象,透過12週共兩階段的教學,前6週以「直接教學」進行體適能教學,後6週則透過「問題導向學習」進行教學。教學實施後,經由小組訪談與學生學習心得蒐集資料進行比較分析。結果:研究結果呈現三種觀點:1.學生對兩種教學策略在學習樂趣與身體活動量之觀點有所不同,認為問題導向學習呈現較多樂趣,但直接教學提供的身體活動量較多;2.在體適能認知吸收程度之觀點,多數學生認為問題導向學習的教學方式在認知的吸收程度較為廣泛、學習效率較高、能使學生學會思考並找出解決問題的方式與產生不同的想法;3.以及同儕關係的發展能透過小組討論等同儕互惠的方式持續成長。結論:本研究不在比較兩種教學策略的優劣,而是冀望透過研究讓教師聽到學生的聲音,適時提供多樣化教學以獲得學生最佳學習成效之參考依據。

並列摘要


Teachers and students have different experiences in the process of ”teaching and learning” from the constructivist aspects in PE (Physical Education), while recognizing the students' is the crucial component within the process of learning. Purpose: To investigate the students' perspectives between two different teaching strategies. Methods: Based on the qualitative method, forty-four college students were volunteered to participate this qualitative analysis study for twelve weeks, ”direct-teaching” (DT) was adopted for PE program in the first six weeks, subsequently, ”problem-based learning” (PBL) was used for the rest of six weeks. After that, qualitative comparative analysis was used through the data collected from group interview and students' reflections. Results: There were three kinds of students' perspectives in this study; first, the difference between two strategies within students' perspectives was PBL had more fun and enjoyment, but there were more physical activities sessions under DTs'. Second, base on the aspect of physical fitness cognition, most students believe PBL had higher positive effects on knowledge realization and efficiency, which could push students think and try to find out solution methods, and different thinking logic. Third, the interpersonal relationships could grow up under group discussion. Conclusion: This study does not consist in compare merits of two different teaching strategies, but the aspirations of teachers had heard form students, and using more kinds of teaching strategies for the optimal student learning effectiveness.

參考文獻


王財印、吳百祿、周新富(2009)。教學原理。臺北市:心理。
李勝雄譯、Ratliffe, T.、Ratliffe, L. M.(2001)。體適能教學—策略與應用。臺北市:五南。
周建智、黃美瑤(2010)。健康體適能教學方案在高中體育課的應用:問題導向學習理論觀點。體育學報。43(2),149-170。
林孟逸、林連池(2001)。從運動動機談—運動樂趣概念之探討。大專體育。54,107-112。
高志薇、蕭淑貞、蔣欣欣、李錦虹(2008)。護理系研究生對問題導向學習之經驗歷程。實證護理。4(1),51-60。

被引用紀錄


陳婉柔(2017)。問題導向學習對國中智能障礙者問題解決能力之研究〔碩士論文,淡江大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6846/TKU.2017.00150
蔡明哲(2014)。以個案研究法介入高職餐旅群專題製作課程之行動研究〔碩士論文,國立高雄餐旅大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6825/NKUHT.2014.00002
傅冠蓉(2013)。高職餐旅群「專題製作課程」績優教師教學歷程之個案研究〔碩士論文,國立高雄餐旅大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6825/NKUHT.2013.00019
王文宜(2011)。「問題導向學習」教學模式介入護專生健康體適能課程之成效〔博士論文,國立臺灣師範大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0021-1610201315234205

延伸閱讀