透過您的圖書館登入
IP:3.144.250.169
  • 期刊
  • Ahead-of-Print

以運動感測器評估羽球單雙打比賽負荷之差異

A comparison of singles and doubles match load in badminton

本文正式版本已出版,請見:10.6222/pej.202309_56(3).0005

摘要


緒論:羽球比賽過程中,運動員需要做跳躍、弓步、快速改變方向和快速揮拍擊球高強度的動作,單打與雙打所採用的戰術打法截然不同,了解單雙打比賽負荷的差異,有助於規劃適當的訓練計畫即恢復策略。本研究的目的為以運動感測器量化羽球選手的運動負荷,並比較單雙打選手比賽負荷的差異。方法:本研究以15名大專男子羽球代表隊選手為實驗參與者。每位選手配戴Capture. U慣性感測器(持拍手腕及下背)、Polar H10心率傳感器(胸部)及Goalgo T1局部定位系統感測器(肩膀),分別進行一局21分落地得分制的羽球單打和雙打模擬賽,收集選手在比賽過程中的運動負荷,以相依樣本t檢定比較單雙打比賽負荷的差異。結果:單打選手的Banister's TRIMP、平均心率、最大心率、移動距離及平均速度皆顯著高於雙打,而sRPE與選手負荷(player load)則無顯著差異。單打的擊球次數、頻率與加速度峰值總和皆顯著高於雙打個人;若以雙打組合與單打進行比較,雙打組合的擊球次數、頻率及加速度峰值總和皆高於單打。結論:單打選手的比賽負荷反應在心率、平均速度及移動距離上,顯示單打比賽對於體能的負荷較高;而雙打比賽則有較高的擊球次數、擊球頻率及峰值總和,顯示雙打比賽對於擊球的負荷較高。由此可見,單打比賽對於體能的要求較高;雙打比賽則需要著重在擊球技巧和兩人擊球的配合與戰術運用。

並列摘要


Introduction: Athletes need in the badminton match. During the badminton game, athletes need to do high-intensity tasks such as jumping, lunging, changing direction quickly and hitting the ball. The tactics are exceedingly different between singles and doubles. To understand the difference of match load between singles and doubles could help us to design a proper training plan and recovery strategy. The aims of this study were to quantify the work load of badminton players with sports sensors and to compare the differences of the match loads between singles and doubles players. Methods : In this study, 15 junior college men's badminton team players were recruited as experimental participants. Each player wears two Capture. U inertial sensors (wrist and lower back), Polar H10 heart rate sensor (chest) and Global T1 local positioning system sensor (shoulder). Each participant plays one singles and one doubles simulated match respectively, then record they work load during the match. The difference in singles and doubles matches loads was analyzed by the dependent sample t-test. Results : Singles players had higher Banister's TRIMP, average heart rate, maximal heart rate, distance covered and average speed. But sRPE and player load had no significant differences. Singles players had higher number of shots, stroke frequency and sum of acceleration peaks. Comparing doubles combinations and singles, the number of shots, stroke frequency and sum of acceleration peaks were higher in doubles combinations. Conclusion: The match load of singles players was reflected in heart rate, average speed and distance covered, indicating that singles match had higher physical load. Doubles matches had higher number of shots, stroke frequency and the sum of acceleration peaks, suggested that doubles matches had higher hitting load. In conclusion, singles match had higher physical demands, doubles match focus on technical and tactical skills.

參考文獻


蔡琪揚、李逸驊、相子元 (2019)。加速規是否能判斷籃球之運動強度?。體育學報,52(3),319-328。https://doi.org/10.6222/ pej.201909_52(3).0004 [Tsai, C.-Y., Lee, Y.-H., & Shiang, T.-Y. (2019) Can accelerometer determine the exercise intensity in basketball drills? Physical Education Journal, 52(3), 319-328.]
盧正崇、呂芳陽 (2006)。2006 年羽球落地計分變革解析。大專體育,83,19-23。https://doi.org/10.6162/SRR.2006.83.04 [Lu, C.-C., & Lu, F.-Y. (2006). 2006 nian yu qiu lao di ji fen bian ge jie xi. Sports Research Review, 83, 19-23.]
Abdullahi, Y., Coetzee, B., & van den Berg, L. (2019). Relationships between results of an internal and external match load determining method in male, singles badminton players. The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 33(4), 1111-1118. https://doi.org/ 10.1519/jsc.0000000000002115
Alcock, A., & Cable, N. T. (2009). A comparison of singles and doubles badminton: Heart rate response, player profiles and game characteristics. International Journal of Performance Analysis in Sport, 9(2), 228-237. https://doi.org/10.1080/24748668. 2009.11868479
Bourdon, P. C., Cardinale, M., Murray, A., Gastin, P., Kellmann, M., Varley, M. C., Gabbett, T. J., Coutts, A. J., Burgess, D. J., Gregson, W., & Cable, N. T. (2017). Monitoring athlete training loads: Consensus statement. International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance, 12(Suppl. 2), 2161-2170. https://doi.org/10.1123/ijspp. 2017-0208

延伸閱讀