透過您的圖書館登入
IP:18.217.228.35
  • 期刊

體育師資培育課程概念重建之反思:以再概念化學派之觀點

A reflection on the reconceptualization of physical education teacher education curriculum from the standpoint of curriculum reconceptualists

摘要


本文以一系列提問與回應串聯起來,旨在澄清課程研究的再概念化思想如何擴散且影響著體育師資培育領域,特別是這個領域的課程研究。本文先藉由闡述課程理論再概念化學派的發展背景、研究立場與持續影響,標示出其理論價值,並以之作為本文研究反思之依據;其次,在嘗試處理再概念化運動對教育領域的影響效力之問題時,本文突顯出研究領域和學科屬性在進行學術討論過程中的重要意義,藉以聚焦研究範疇至體育師資培育的課程研究;再次,經蒐尋與分析學術刊物之研究文獻,本文得以討論再概念化課程研究成果對體育師資培育課程研究產生了何種作用之問題,指明一種單面向的認識偏態後,再與再概念化的解放精神進行對話;最後,本文建議未來的體育師資培育課程研究應轉而關注其發生情境與經驗內涵,同時採取其它描述方法進行現象的紀錄與研究,以展現此種課程現象的經驗特殊性並促發其理論化進程。

並列摘要


This paper connected a serious of questions and corresponding responses aiming to clarify how the curriculum reconceptualists' thinking diffused and influenced the field of physical education teacher education (PETE), especially those curriculum studies in this field. First, this paper delineated the historical background, academic standpoint and continuous impact of reconceptualization paradigm in curriculum theory, identifying its theoretical value and adopting it as the basis of reflection. Second, in order to understand the impact of the reconceptualization movement on the field of education, this paper highlighted the important meanings of the differences of the field of inquiry and attribute of discipline in the process of academic debate, and narrow down our scope of inquiry to the curriculum studies in PETE. Third, by collecting and analyzing the research literature published in a renowned journal, this paper was able to discuss the question of what effects the research of curriculum reconceptualization had on the curriculum studies of PETE and the issue of emancipation advocated by reconceptualists after pointing out one-dimensioned skewness of knowing in contemporary discourse. Last, this paper suggested that future PETE curriculum studies should turn to concern the lived circumstances and the connotation of experiences which make PETE curriculum being itself, and to utilize descriptive method as a way of capturing and studying it for both revealing the specificity of experiences of PETE curriculum and initiating its theorizing process.

參考文獻


卯靜儒(2004)。重新馬克思主義到後結構主義─課程社會學研究的再概念化。教育研究集刊。50(1),119-142。
吳清山(2006)。師資培育的理念與實踐。教育研究與發展期刊。2(1),1-32。
宋秋美、周啟葶(2010)。Macdonald 課程理論之探究。教育學刊。35,31-63。
許芳懿(2006)。再概念化:課程改革的邏輯與實踐。課程研究。1(2),47-67。
陳伯璋(1983)。課程研究的「第三勢力」─美國「再概念化」學派課程理論之評介。國立臺灣師範大學教育研究所集刊。25,179-226。

被引用紀錄


陳萩慈、掌慶維、詹恩華(2023)。師資培育者在體育教材教法課自我研究的發展與實踐歷程體育學報56(S),37-58。https://doi.org/10.6222/pej.202312_56(S).0003
許琇琳、潘敏、柯重宇、尚憶薇、徐偉庭(2022)。體育師資培育生學科學習之探究:以三重效能模式為基礎體育學報55(3),309-321。https://doi.org/10.6222/pej.202209_55(3).0006

延伸閱讀