透過您的圖書館登入
IP:18.216.209.112
  • 期刊

解析台灣人/中國人認同:2000-2021年

An Analysis of Taiwanese/Chinese Identity: 2000-2021

摘要


本文以2000至2021年間的焦點團體及深入訪談等質性資料,分析台灣民眾對於「台灣人」、「中國人」及「都是(雙重認同)」的定義與意涵,以釐清民眾認同的標的及界限。分析的結果顯示:台灣民眾的認同內容,持續且集中在以台灣為中心的我群意識;與中國的原生聯繫雖然持續存在,但大多僅被視為客觀事實,無法產生或轉換為我群的認同意識;變化較大的是大中國意識的認同內容,已幾乎完全消失在民眾的論述中。從認同界限的觀點而言,本文的資料明確顯示許多台灣民眾己經將台灣/中華民國視為我群、中國/中華人民共和國視為他群,此種認同意識的產生,也標示著認同界限的變化,是台灣認同進入「國家認同」階段的佐證。而國家認同意識的逐漸清晰與升高,也讓台灣認同隱然有形成集體認同的傾向。

並列摘要


This paper employs qualitative data collected through focus group and in-depth interviews during the period of 2000-2021., tThe proposed research aims to explore how Taiwanese people define and interpret "Taiwanese", "Chinese" and "both Taiwanese and Chinese (dual identities)", and also to clarify people's identity target and boundary. The result shows that Taiwanese people's identity contents are continuous and concentrated in the Taiwan-centered "we group" consciousness. The primordialist ties with China persists, yet most of them are regarded as objective facts and cannot be generated or converted into the "we group" consciousness. The major change is that the Chinese consciousness has almost disappeared from popular discourse. Our data also shows that many Taiwanese people have treated Taiwan (Republic of China) as the "we group", and China (People's Republic of China) as the "they group". This finding indicates that Taiwan identity has reached the stage of national identity in terms of boundary setting. The gradual clarity and elevationed consciousness of national identity impliesy that Taiwan has the tendency of reaching a collective identity.

參考文獻


蒙志成,2016,〈越融合或越疏離?解析當前兩岸交流下台灣民眾身分認同的內涵與影響〉,《台灣政治學刊》,20(2): 187-262。(Meng, Chih-cheng. 2016. “Yue rong he huo yue shu li? jie xi dang qian liang an jiao liu xia tai wan min zhong shen fen ren tong de nei han yu ying xiang”[Further Integration or Drifting Apart? Uncovering the Nature and Influence of the Taiwanese People@@$$s Self-Identity under the Circumstances of the Current Cross-Strait Exchange Relationship]. Taiwan Political Science Review 20(2): 187-262.)
楊婉瑩、李冠成,2011,〈一個屋簷下的性別權力關係對國家認同的影響(1996-2008)〉,《選舉研究》,18(1): 95-137。(Yang,Wan-ying, and Kuan-chen Lee. 2011. “yi ge wu yan xia de xing bie quan li guan xi dui guo jia ren tong de ying xiang (1996-2008)” [Exploring the Influence of Gender Power on National Identity under the Same Roof (1996-2008)]. Journal of Electoral Studies 18(1): 95-137)
劉義周,2000,《台灣民眾主要政治認同概念之研究I》,計畫編號:NSC 89-2414-H-004-022-SSS,台北:行政院國家科學委員會補助專題研究計畫。(Liu, I-chou. 2000. “ai wan min zhong zhu yao zheng zhi ren tong gai nian zhi yan jiu I” [A Study on Major Political Identities of Taiwan Public I]. NSC89-2414-H-004-022-SSS. Taipei: Ministry of Science and Technology Research Project.)
劉義周,2002,《台灣民眾主要政治認同概念之研究II》,計畫編號:NSC 89-2414-H-004-049,台北:行政院國家科學委員會補助專題研究計畫。(Liu, I-chou. 2002. “Tai wan min zhong zhu yao zheng zhi ren tong gai nian zhi yan jiu I” [A Study on Major Political Identities of Taiwan Public II]. NSC 89-2414-H-004-049. Taipei: Ministry of Science and Technology Research Project.)
鄭夙芬,2005,〈焦點團體研究法之理論與應用〉,《選舉研究》,12(1): 211-239。(Cheng, Su-feng. 2005. “Jiao dian tuan ti yan jiu fa zhi li lun yu ying yong” [Focus Group: Theory and Application]. Journal of Electoral Studies 12(1): 211-239.)

延伸閱讀