透過您的圖書館登入
IP:52.15.207.126
  • 期刊

呼吸管路更換頻率對使用呼吸器病人感染肺炎之影響

Impact on Ventilator-associated Pneumonia with Different Intervals of Ventilator Circuit Exchange

若您是本文的作者,可授權文章由華藝線上圖書館中協助推廣。

摘要


The purpose of this prospective study was to explore different methods of ventilator circuit change on lowering ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) rates in a regional teaching hospital. Over a 54-week period, 136 patients with the use of ventilators in an intensive care unit were assigned to two groups. Sixty-seven patients in the group 1 received circuit changes once a week (7d), while 69 patients in the group 2 received circuit changes three times a week (2-3d). The effects of APACHE 11 score, Glasgow coma scale, shock, vital signs, biophysical values, and the use of antibiotics and nebulizers were investigated. The results showed that the overall VAP of 136 patients was 15.44%: 16.42% in the group 1 and 14.49% in the group 2. On average, there were 11.64 VAP per 1000 ventilator days of 136 patients: 12.54 in the group 1 and 10.79 in the group 2. There was no significant difference between the two groups. Yet, pulse rate, respiratory rate, systolic pressure, pulmonary infection, respiratory failure, shock, 1St day APACHE Ii score after ventilator therapy within 24hours, and nebulizer therapy were found as significant factors related to the VAP (P<0.05). Ventilator circuit can be safely changed at weekly intervals to save the cost.

並列摘要


The purpose of this prospective study was to explore different methods of ventilator circuit change on lowering ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) rates in a regional teaching hospital. Over a 54-week period, 136 patients with the use of ventilators in an intensive care unit were assigned to two groups. Sixty-seven patients in the group 1 received circuit changes once a week (7d), while 69 patients in the group 2 received circuit changes three times a week (2-3d). The effects of APACHE 11 score, Glasgow coma scale, shock, vital signs, biophysical values, and the use of antibiotics and nebulizers were investigated. The results showed that the overall VAP of 136 patients was 15.44%: 16.42% in the group 1 and 14.49% in the group 2. On average, there were 11.64 VAP per 1000 ventilator days of 136 patients: 12.54 in the group 1 and 10.79 in the group 2. There was no significant difference between the two groups. Yet, pulse rate, respiratory rate, systolic pressure, pulmonary infection, respiratory failure, shock, 1St day APACHE Ii score after ventilator therapy within 24hours, and nebulizer therapy were found as significant factors related to the VAP (P<0.05). Ventilator circuit can be safely changed at weekly intervals to save the cost.

被引用紀錄


劉彩娥(2010)。運用醫療失效模式與效應分析於呼吸管路安全之改善〔碩士論文,中臺科技大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6822/CTUST.2010.00001
胡淑琴、李茹萍(2012)。重症病患呼吸器相關肺炎的預防與照護護理雜誌59(4),12-17。https://doi.org/10.6224/JN.59.4.12

延伸閱讀