《漢學研究》歷史類論著引用文獻計量分析（2004－2009）

A Quantitative Analysis of Citations in History Articles Published in Chinese Studies between 2004 and 2009

耿立群(Li-Chun Keng)

《國家圖書館館刊》 100年2期 (2011/12) Pp. 99-125

摘要

《漢學研究》自1983年創刊迄今，已成為國內很重要的人文研究學報，亦為國際漢學界知名的學術期刊。本文係以引文分析的方法，針對《漢學研究》近六年（第22－27卷，2004－2009年）歷史類論著82篇之引用文獻4,293筆做計量分析，以一窺歷史學論文的引用習慣和特性，並進一步了解其研究概況與發展趨勢。研究結果顯示，《漢學研究》近六年刊登之歷史類論文，皆附有很多附註和引用文獻，其中以古籍所占比例最高，其次是專書。引用文獻以中文資料最多，中國大陸出版者居半。出版距今六至三十年的書刊被引用得最多，可見文獻老化速度十分緩慢。引用文獻主要集中於史學領域，雖參考利用的書刊種類相當廣泛分散，本文仍試圖找出最常被引用的期刊21種、圖書29種，和現代作者18位。至於自我引用，《漢學研究》期刊本身的自我引用並不明顯，而雖有近六成的論文有作者自我引用的現象，但引用筆數的比例很低。

關鍵字

《漢學研究》 ； 歷史學 ； 期刊論文 ； 書目計量 ； 引用文獻 ； 引文分析

並列摘要

First published in 1983, ”Chinese Studies” has become not only an important journal of the humanities locally, but also an internationally-renowned sinological periodical. This paper analyzes the citations used in the past 6 years (volumes 22-27, 2004-2009) of history articles published in ”Chinese Studies”. A quantitative analysis of the 4,293 different citations made in a total of 82 such articles offers an overall glimpse of the habits and features of citation use, and facilitates a better understanding of the content and development trends of research carried out in the field of history in recent years. The results of this study show that the history articles published in ”Chinese Studies” during this period feature extensive notes and citations, the largest number of which refer to ancient works, followed by recent books. Most citations refer to materials in Chinese, with half of these published in mainland China. Books published between 6 and 30 years ago are most frequently cited, indicating that materials are passing out of use very slowly. Cited materials mainly focus on the historical studies field, and although a wide range of books are used for reference, this research attempts to identify the 21 most cited periodicals, 29 most cited books, and 18 most cited modern authors. Authors' citations of their own works are not at all clear in ”Chinese Studies”, and although almost 60 percent of the works analyzed use self-citation, they represent a relatively low proportion of total citations.

並列關鍵字

Chinese Studies ； historical studies ； journal articles ； bibliometric analysis ； references ； citation analysis

參考文獻

Lawani, Stephen M.(1982).On the Heterogeneity and Classification of Author Self-Citations.Journal of the American Society for Information Science.33(5),281-284.

方美芬(2005)。1979-2002年中國大陸閩粵地區發表臺灣文學論文文獻計量分析。中華民國圖書館學會會報。74，261-276。

王國聰(1998)。我國近六年來「教學科技與媒體」期刊論文及其引用文獻分析。大學圖書館。2(3)，127-151。

王錫璋(1999)。參考工具書的利用。臺北:國家圖書館。

北京大學圖書館學系編、武漢大學圖書館學系編(1985)。圖書館古籍編目。北京:中華書局。