透過您的圖書館登入
IP:3.142.197.198
  • 期刊

威權領導與情緒勞務之關聯研究

Investigating the Relationship between Authoritarian Leadership and Subordinate's Emotional Labor

摘要


本研究以情緒調節模型(Grandey, 2000)探討直屬主管的威權領導風格對部屬所採的情緒勞務策略及其後續工作態度的影響。此外,本研究亦認為,部屬個人傳統性具調節部屬表層演出與深層演出之情緒勞務策略採用的效果。本研究以台北地區某家公立醫院之286位在職且有直屬主管之員工為發放對象。研究結果證實表層演出與深層演出對威權領導風格與部屬工作態度的中介效果,威權領導風格使部屬傾向採取表層演出進而導致情緒耗竭,也會使部屬較少採用深層演出策略而使得其敬業貢獻較不會產生。不過,本研究亦發現,部屬的個人傳統性會增加其在面對威權領導風格的主管時深層演出策略的採用,減少表層演出採用的情形。本研究結果不僅對於威權領導風格如何影響部屬的情緒勞務之問題,提供了可能的解釋,亦提供可能的因應和建議。

並列摘要


Base on the suggestion from Grandey (2000), individuals regulate their emotions through deep acting or surface acting which will affect their job attitude. The aim of this research is to investigate how individuals regulate their emotions when interacting with their authoritarian leader and its effect on their job attitude. A questionnaire survey was conducted in the greater Taipei area. Data was collected from 286 employees, working in public hospitals, who are under supervision from their direct supervisor. Findings of the research suggest that controlling the number of respondents interacting with their supervisors, authoritarian style of leadership enhances an employee's emotional labor of surface acting which would cause an employee's emotional exhaustion; however if an employee values one's traditionality then it would moderate the relationship between authoritarian leadership and surface acting. On the other hand, authoritarian style of leadership will less likely stimulate an employee's emotional labor of deep acting which would then lessen an employee's work engagement; however when employees values one's traditionality then it would moderate the relationship between authoritarian leadership and deep acting. This study not only offers possible explanation on how authoritarian leaders affect an employee's emotional labor and its effect on job attitude but also provides practical suggestions to organizations.

參考文獻


吳宗祐(2008)。由不當督導到情緒耗竭:部屬正義知覺與情緒勞動的中介效果。中華心理學刊。50,201-221。
吳宗祐(2013)。主管與部屬互動中情緒勞動:回顧、釐清、及前瞻。人力資源管理學報。13(3),57-105。
吳宗祐、徐瑋伶、鄭伯壎(2002)。怒不可遏或忍氣吞聲:華人企業主管威權領導與部屬憤怒反應。本土心理學研究。18,3-49。
吳宗祐、廖紘億(2013)。華人威權領導總是導致部屬負面結果嗎?由『不確定管理理論』探討威權領導對分配不公平與程序不公平之交互作用與部屬工作滿意度之關係的調節效果。中華心理學刊。55,1-22。
吳宗祐、鄭伯壎(2006)。工作投入、調節他人情緒能力與情緒勞動之交互作用對情緒耗竭的預測效果。中華心理學刊。48,69-87。

被引用紀錄


黃玉鈴(2016)。情緒勞務與工作滿足關聯之研究〔碩士論文,淡江大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6846/TKU.2016.00850
吳金龍(2016)。警察人員幸福感與情緒勞務之研究-以彰化縣政府警察局為例〔碩士論文,淡江大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6846/TKU.2016.00210
陳怡靜、吳宗祐、林雨屏(2023)。威權領導與員工建言行為:華人主管與部屬之傳統性扮演的角色人力資源管理學報23(2),1-28。https://doi.org/10.6147/JHRM.202312_23(2).0001
李庭閣、周婉茹、李啓文、費吳琛(2023)。部屬啊!您有做自己的機會嗎?尚嚴、專權雙元領導與部屬任務績效之關聯性:以情緒調節策略揭開潘朵拉的盒子組織與管理16(2),69-130。https://doi.org/10.53106/199687602023081602002
張齡予(2016)。主管不當督導與部屬情緒耗竭之關聯性研究:以部屬情緒勞動為中介因素〔碩士論文,國立中正大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0033-2110201614050196

延伸閱讀