透過您的圖書館登入
IP:3.128.190.102
  • 期刊

視訊面談與現場面談情況下面試官給予應徵者表現評價的比較:面試官調節焦點之干擾效果

Comparison Between Interviewers' Evaluation of Interviewee Performance in Face to Face and Video Interview Scenarios: The Moderating Effect of Interviewers' Regulatory Focus

摘要


本研究目的在比較面試官在視訊面談與現場面談不同媒介下給予應徵者表現評價的差異性,同時比較促進焦點型與預防焦點型面試官給予應徵者表現評價的差異性,進一步分析面談媒介與面試官調節焦點類型對應徵者表現評價的交互作用。本研究採用模擬面談的受試者間類實驗設計,分析280位在職大學生及EMBA研究生的樣本資料獲得以下發現:首先,面試官在現場面談情況給予應徵者的表現評價高於視訊面談情況;其次,促進焦點型面試官給予應徵者表現評價高於預防焦點型面試官;最後,促進焦點型面試官在現場面談與視訊面談情況給予應徵者的表現評價無顯著差異,但是預防焦點型面試官在現場面談情況下給予應徵者的表現評價高於視訊面談情況。本研究討論研究發現在學術發展的價值以及在面談實務上的意義。

並列摘要


This study aimed to explore the differences between video and face to face interviews regarding the interviewer's evaluation on the interviewee's performance. Concurrently, promotion-focused and prevention-focused interviewers were compared in relation to their evaluation of interviewee performance to further analyze the interaction effect between interview medium and the interviewer's regulatory focus on his or her evaluation of an interviewee's performance. This study adopted a between-subject quasi experimental design and conducted interview simulations, in which researcher A role-played as the interviewee according to a script prepared in advance. Convenience sampling was performed to recruit participants among students with work experience from an EMBA program and a continuing education program at a university of science and technology in northern Taiwan. An analysis on 280 valid responses revealed the following results. The interviewers had higher evaluation of the interviewee performance in face to face interviews than in video interviews. Promotion-focused interviewers gave higher evaluation of the interviewee performance than did prevention-focused interviewers. Promotion-focused interviewers' evaluation of interviewee performance did not differ in the in-person and video interview scenarios. By contrasts, prevention-focused interviewers' evaluation of interviewee performance was higher in the in-person interview scenario than in the video interview scenario. The research findings contribute to academic development and provide practical implications in interview settings.

參考文獻


孫蒨如、李易儒(2004)。訊息型態及思考目的對稀釋效果的影響。中華心理學刊,46(1),57-74。doi:10.6129/CJP.2004.4601.05
陳建丞、蔡維奇(2005)。面談前印象對面試官評量效應之探討:以面談結構性為干擾變數。台大管理論叢,16(1),155-170。doi:10.6226/NTURM2005.16.1.155
羅新興、李幸穗(2004)。應徵者面談過程所呈現的訊息對面談評價的影響:以企業員工的招募甄選為實驗情境。人力資源管理學報,4(3),55-72。doi:10.6147/JHRM.2004.0403.03
Arvey, R. D., & Campion, J. E. (1982). The employment interview: A summary and review of recent research. Personnel Psychology, 35, 281-322. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1982.tb02197.x
Bauer, T. N., Truxillo, D. M., Paronto, M. E., Weekley, J. A., & Campion, M. A. (2004). Applicant reactions to different selection technology: Face-to-face, interactive voice response, and computer-assisted telephone screening interviews. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 12, 135-148. doi:10.1111/j.0965-075X.2004.00269.x

延伸閱讀