透過您的圖書館登入
IP:3.145.163.58
  • 期刊

運用多元策略提升護理人員執行疼痛評估正確率之專案

Use of Multiple Strategies for Implementation of the Project to Assessment the Accuracy of Pain

摘要


提升疼痛評估能力是疼痛處理品質重要的一環。疼痛處置過程首重準確的疼痛評估,透過疼痛評估結果並詳細的記錄,才能適當處置且正確用藥,有效降低疼痛程度以對生活的影響。本專案旨在提升護理人員執行疼痛評估正確率。臨床發現護理人員疼痛評估內容不完整、工具使用錯誤、缺乏實作教學及評估指引、執行疼痛評估認知不足等,影響護理人員執行疼痛評估正確率僅57.6%,經專案措施介入:1.建置疼痛評估照護指引。2.舉辦疼痛評估教育訓練。3.發展疼痛評估mini-CEX評量表。4.設計疼痛評估輔助工具。專案實施後,護理人員疼痛評估認知率提升31.7%、執行疼痛評估正確率由改善前57.1%提升至91.3%,病人滿意得分也由3.5分提升至4.2分(5分法)達專案目的。期能提供教育界規劃完整疼痛評估與照護課程,並做為新進人員訓練基礎,有效運用於臨床實務,共同改善病人疼痛問題,達病人、護師及醫院三贏局面。

關鍵字

疼痛 照護指引 mini-CEX 輔助工具

並列摘要


The enhancement of nurses' pain assessment capabilities is an important part of the quality of pain management. Through pain assessment results and detailed records, appropriate disposal and medication can be administered, thereby effectively reducing the degree of pain and decreasing its impact on life .The project aims to enhance the accuracy of nurses to perform pain assessment. Several problems were identified including incomplete pain assessment performed by nurses, wrong tools were used, lack of clear guidance for teaching and assessment, and inadequate recognition of implementing pain assessment. As a result, only 57.6% of nurses performed proper pain assessment. The project intervention measures included: 1. building a care guide for pain assessment; 2. organizing pain assessment education and training courses; 3. developing pain assessment mini-CEX assessment sheet; 4. designing pain assessment aid tools. After implementing the project, the perception of pain assessment among nurses increased 31.7%, the execution of pain assessment increased from 57.6% to 91.3%, and the patients' satisfaction score increased from 3.5 to 4.2 out of 5. The article provides a reference for designing a training program to enhance the ability to perform pain assessment among nurses so that the quality of pain care can be improved.

並列關鍵字

pain care guide mini-CEX aids

參考文獻


吳淑芬、林貴珍、陳正彥、蘇浩博、劉洪香水、李來涼、洪俊傑(2014)。提升疼痛護理指導之成效。北市醫學雜誌。11(4),84-94。
李石增(2013)。臨床能力評量指引。台北市=Taipei City, Taiwan, ROC:台灣愛思唯爾=Elsevier Taiwan。
林芷彤、賴淑芬、黃怡菁、林玲雅、張玉君、孫茂勝(2011)。以病歷審查評估醫院的病人疼痛照護品質。病歷資訊管理。10(2),48-60。
林偉文(2011)。創意教學與創造力的培育─以「設計思考」為例。教育資料與研究雙月刊。10(2),53-74。
明金蓮、洪曉佩(2011)。急性疼痛評估與症狀護理。源遠護理。5(1),11-16。

被引用紀錄


蔡宜玲、徐琦溦(2023)。照顧一位神經膠母細胞瘤復發個案之護理經驗長庚護理34(),1-11。https://doi.org/10.6386/CGN.202304/SP_34_1.0005
田謹翠、柯幸芳(2020)。運用跨領域團隊照護一位初次罹患直腸癌個案之護理經驗長庚護理31(1),100-111。https://doi.org/10.6386/CGN.202003_31(1).0009
陳莉雅、孫郁菁、鄭靜如、潘美連、劉介宇、邱淑芬(2022)。以資訊系統成功模式評值護理人員使用疼痛照護系統之成效護理雜誌69(1),63-72。https://doi.org/10.6224/JN.202202_69(1).09
李秋譁、馬震中、王建仁、陳俊道、丘周萍(2018)。不同護理衛教方式對手術後病人使用自控式止痛之成效榮總護理35(2),136-144。https://doi.org/10.6142/VGHN.201806_35(2).0003
呂靜宜、郭佳薰(2023)。照護一位末期腎病變青少年接受腎臟移植手術之護理經驗臺灣腎臟護理學會雜誌21(2),27-40。https://doi.org/10.53106/172674042023082102003

延伸閱讀