透過您的圖書館登入
IP:18.226.169.94
  • 期刊
  • OpenAccess

大學生對基因改造作物議題的認知與論證能力之研究

University Students' Knowledge and Argumentation Skills Concerning a Socio-Scientific Issue

摘要


This study investigated undergraduate students' knowledge, argumentation skills and the relationship between them in the context of a socio-scientific issue-Genetically Modified Organisms (GMO). Eighty undergraduate students were categorized into two groups: biology majors and non-biology majors. Two open-ended questionnaires were respectively used to evaluate students' argumentation skills and to measure their understanding of three kinds of GMO knowledge-ontological, epistemological and situational knowledge. The results revealed that biology majors scored significantly higher than non-biology majors in ontological knowledge, epistemological knowledge, situational knowledge and in overall knowledge (p<.001). Biology majors broadly performed significantly better than non-biology majors on argumentation quality (p<.05). A significantly positive correlation exists between the students' argumentation skills and their respective scores on ontological knowledge, situational knowledge and overall knowledge (r=.21-.27, p<.05). The educational implications for improving university students' knowledge about GMO issues and argumentation skills were discussed.

並列摘要


This study investigated undergraduate students' knowledge, argumentation skills and the relationship between them in the context of a socio-scientific issue-Genetically Modified Organisms (GMO). Eighty undergraduate students were categorized into two groups: biology majors and non-biology majors. Two open-ended questionnaires were respectively used to evaluate students' argumentation skills and to measure their understanding of three kinds of GMO knowledge-ontological, epistemological and situational knowledge. The results revealed that biology majors scored significantly higher than non-biology majors in ontological knowledge, epistemological knowledge, situational knowledge and in overall knowledge (p<.001). Biology majors broadly performed significantly better than non-biology majors on argumentation quality (p<.05). A significantly positive correlation exists between the students' argumentation skills and their respective scores on ontological knowledge, situational knowledge and overall knowledge (r=.21-.27, p<.05). The educational implications for improving university students' knowledge about GMO issues and argumentation skills were discussed.

參考文獻


沈孝宙(2008)。轉基因之爭。北京:化學工業。
邱皓政(2006)。量化研究與統計分析—SPSS中文視窗版資料分析範例解析。臺北市:五南。
林燕文、洪振方(2007)。對話論證的探究中學童論述策略對促進科學概念理解之研究。屏東教育大學學報。26,285-324。
林燕文、洪振方(2007)。對話論證的探究對促進學童科學概念理解之探討。花蓮教育大學學報。24,139-177。
林樹聲(2004)。通識素養的培育與爭議性科技議題的教學。南華通識教育研究。2,25-37。

被引用紀錄


陳文正、古智雄(2023)。從「熱認知觀點」探討國小學童的論證學習與科學解釋合理性判斷之研究科學教育學刊31(2),109-132。https://doi.org/10.6173/CJSE.202306_31(2).0001

延伸閱讀