透過您的圖書館登入
IP:3.144.189.177
  • 期刊
  • OpenAccess

PISA視角下:數學素養概念架構與量表工具之發展與驗證

PISA Perspective: Development and Validation of Conceptual Framework and Scale Instrument for Mathematical Literacy

摘要


本研究旨在編製「數學素養量表」,作為評估中學生所持有數學素養能力之個別差異的測量工具。目前數學素養測驗評量,著重在教學後評量學生素養能力的測量上,偏重於特定數學主題且是在短時間內的評估,有鑑於數學素養是長時間的培養與發展,且用於教學現場之素養評量未能有效縱觀評估學生長期的發展。因此,本研究發展具一般性的數學素養量表,以PISA的評測視角出發,從「數學本質」、「數學思維」、「數學表徵」、「數學合作」與「民族數學」五個構面來建立「數學素養量表」。為了驗證此量表的信度和效度,本研究採便利取樣,抽取639位高雄市某技術型高中學生作為受測樣本,因素分析結果獲得五個因素,符合預試量表之五個構面,共刪除8道不良題目,保留32道題目,形成具有建構效度的數學素養量表。數學本質、數學思維、數學表徵、數學合作與民族數學五個構面上的信度分別為.848、.889、.935、.954以及.914,整體信度為.947,顯示數學素養量表符合良好以上程度之信度評判標準(凃金堂,2009)。研究結果表明,本研究所編製的中學生「數學素養量表」題項所測量之五個構念成分皆符合文獻回顧之理論架構,可作為評估學生所持有數學素養能力之個別差異的測量工具。

並列摘要


This study aimed to develop a reliable and effective questionnaire of Mathematical Literacy Scale (MLS) for high school students. This study developed a general mathematics literacy scale based on PISA perspectives in five dimensions: nature of mathematics, mathematical thinking, mathematical representation, mathematical cooperation and ethnomathematics. By convenient sampling, a pilot study using 639 senior high school students as the subjects was conducted to examine the validity and reliability of the MLS. Explorative factor analyses and confirmatory factor analyses were conducted in this study and finally 32 items were left in the final scale under the above five subscales, after removing 8 items. The internal consistency of the Cronbach's α ranged between .848 and .954 for the five subscales and was .947 for the overall scale. This suggested that the MLS was a reliable instrument for assessing high school students' mathematics literacy from a PISA perspective.

參考文獻


王玉珍、吳清麟、李宜玫(2014)。成人工作家庭優勢量表之發展研究。中華輔導與諮商學報,41,57-91。
劉柏宏(2016)。從數學與文化的關係探討數學文化素養之內涵──理論與案例分析。臺灣數學教育期刊,3(1),55-83。https://doi.org/10.6278/tjme.20160413.001
劉柏宏(2021)。數學人文教案培養數學文化素養之理論探討與反思。臺灣數學教育期刊,8(1),1-25。https://doi.org/10.6278/tjme.202104_8(1).001
Ascher, M. (1994). Ethnomathematics: A multicultural view of mathematical ideas. CRC. https://doi.org/10.1201/9780203756522
Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (1988). On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 16(1), 74-94.

延伸閱讀