Intention tremor has been treated with a variety of procedures including medications, use of weights on the affected limbs or supportive devices. Efficacy study of limb weighting treatment is, however, sparse. This investigation was designed to examine how patients with intention tremor responded to various weights and locations of weighted cuff when performing prehensile movements. Fifteen patients with intention tremor were instructed to reach forward to open the jar with a 6 cm diameter under five experimental conditions. One condition was the control one (i.e., no weight). The other four conditions were formed by the crossing of the cuff weights (480g vs. 720g) and locations (upper arm vs. wrist). Reaching movement was recorded using a 6-camera three-dimensional motion analysis system. ANOVA with repeated measures were performed for each kinematic variable. In patients with cerebellar or brain stem lesions, the conditions of adding various weights on the upper arm and wrist significantly improved movement kinematics in comparison with the control condition, as represented by decreasing movement time, total displacement and movement unit (p<0.05), and increasing the percentage of time to peak velocity (p<0.05). The results demonstrated wearing the weight cuffs would facilitate more efficient and smoother movements than wearing nothing. The findings of this study suggested beneficial effects be established when the cuff with lighter weight was placed on the wrist or that with heavier weight on the upper arm.
Intention tremor has been treated with a variety of procedures including medications, use of weights on the affected limbs or supportive devices. Efficacy study of limb weighting treatment is, however, sparse. This investigation was designed to examine how patients with intention tremor responded to various weights and locations of weighted cuff when performing prehensile movements. Fifteen patients with intention tremor were instructed to reach forward to open the jar with a 6 cm diameter under five experimental conditions. One condition was the control one (i.e., no weight). The other four conditions were formed by the crossing of the cuff weights (480g vs. 720g) and locations (upper arm vs. wrist). Reaching movement was recorded using a 6-camera three-dimensional motion analysis system. ANOVA with repeated measures were performed for each kinematic variable. In patients with cerebellar or brain stem lesions, the conditions of adding various weights on the upper arm and wrist significantly improved movement kinematics in comparison with the control condition, as represented by decreasing movement time, total displacement and movement unit (p<0.05), and increasing the percentage of time to peak velocity (p<0.05). The results demonstrated wearing the weight cuffs would facilitate more efficient and smoother movements than wearing nothing. The findings of this study suggested beneficial effects be established when the cuff with lighter weight was placed on the wrist or that with heavier weight on the upper arm.