修訂立定跳遠發展階段觀察檢核表

本研究的目的是修訂一份適用評估男性四歲至六歲（前運思期）的「立定跳遠發展階段觀察檢核表」。Haywood(1993)的「立定跳遠發展階段觀察檢核表」共計六個觀察項目，在其他的研究中發現內部一致性信度不良和不適合Rasch模式，認為須要修訂此檢核表，本研究受試者是460名四歲至六歲男性兒童。主要是利用RUMM2020軟體分析，結果修正兩題失序問題，並刪除一題殘是超過2.5標準的試題，獲得單向度、類別和閾值合理的檢核表；最後，再用結構方程模式驗證檢核表為單向度，經修正模式增加第六題和第三題誤差的共變關係後，證明本研究「修訂立定跳遠發展階段觀察檢核表」是良好的單向度。結論為本研究修訂的男性四歲至六歲（前運思期）的立定跳遠發展階段檢核表具有良好品質。

關鍵字

修訂測驗；立定跳遠；觀察檢核表； Rasch測量；動作發展；單向度

並列摘要

The purpose of the study was to revise the Assessing Development Level of the Standing Long Jump Observation Checklist for assessing the Preoperational stage (age 4 to 6) of human. In the Haywood's (1993) ”Assessing the Development Level of the Standing Long Jump Observation Checklist”, there were six observational Items. In the Liu's (2005) research, it found out that the reliability of internal consistency was 0.64 only and there were two poor items in item analysis. On the other, in Chou and Yau's (2006) research, it used the Partial Credit Model of Rasch and discovered that ”the Outfit Mean Square of the sixth item was 1.92, which was misfitted model; secondly, the categorical disorder was existed in the third item.” Therefore, we had to revise checklist, and the subjects of this research were 460 boys aged from 4 to 6 years old. We used the RUMM2020 to analyze and to revise the disorder of two items, and eliminated an item whose residual was over 2.5 or less -2.5 to achieve a unidimention, category and reasonable checklist; finally ,we used Structure Equation Modeling to confirm that the checklist is unidimentional, and by model modification, added covariance of error of the sixth item and the third item to prove that 'A revision of the assessing the developmental level of the standing long jump” is good unidimentional. The conclusion was that a revision of the checklist of the developmental level of the standing long jump for the boy's age from 4 to 6 (Preoperational stage) could have high quality.