我國社區培力中心運作類型之分析：社區能力建構觀點

社區培力的概念在1990年後漸成為社區工作的方法之一。衛生福利部亦在2015年將設置培力（育成）中心列為主軸補助項目。本研究以全國23個社區培力中心為對象，進行運作類型之分析。採質性設計，整理各培力中心的經營資料，並透過訪談澄清各中心之運作理念及實況以歸納運作類型。研究透過「社區培力目標」、「對社區培力理解」、「改變社區組織策略」、「運作原則」、「實地輔導做法」、「專業技術」與「中心角色」等七個面向進行分析，歸納得出「專業」、「方案」、「支援」與「政治」四種運作類型。其中「專業型」與社區能力建構有較高對應，而「方案型」僅對應部分能力面向。四種類型反應出我國社區政策及專業發展中不同階段的重心。作者省思：培力中心既係參酌西方理念而設置，其任務應專注於提升社區組織能力；並建議進一步探究社工專業人員進行社區培力所採取的模式取向。

關鍵字

社區培力中心；社區能力建構；專業社區工作

並列摘要

Community empowerment has been practiced as a professional skill in community work since the 1990s. In Taiwan, the 23 community empowerment centers funded by the Ministry of Health and Welfare were set by 21 local authorities for promoting community capacity. This study aimed to explore the practices of the empowerment centers and to crystallize the types of them from the in-depth interview data and operation information. The collected interviewed data were analyzed from seven dimensions: goals of empowerment, understanding of community empowerment, changes strategies, practical methods, professional skills, operational principles, and the role of the centers. Finally, we found the four types and named them Professional, Plan-implement, Supporting and Networking, and Political. The Professional highly correlated with community empowerment, and the Plan-implement were partially correlated. Additionally, the four types of centers reflected the various focus of community development policies and the different stages of community work. The authors' reflections are that the community empowerment centers which were set based on the community capacity building theories should focus on community capacity building. In addition, for further research, how to operate the community empowerment, and how professional social workers use the types of community empowerment may be explored.

並列關鍵字

community empowerment center ； community capacity building ； professional community work

參考文獻

李易駿（2016a）。〈轉變中的社區發展：臺灣社區發展政策之歷史制度論分析〉，《社會政策與社會工作學刊》，第 20 卷第 2 期，頁 175-226。doi: 10.6785/SPSW.201612_20(2).0005【Lee, Y.-J. (2016a). ‘The Community Development in Transition:A Policy Analysis for Community Development from HistoricalInstitutionalism Perspective’, Social Policy & Social Work, 20(2):175-226. doi: 10.6785/SPSW.201612_20(2).0005】

林秉賢（2017）。〈臺灣社會工作者的專業繼續教育生態適配度、專業支持感與專業價值感對專業勝任能力之影響〉，《臺大社會工作學刊》，第 36 期，頁 47-96。doi: 10.6171/ntuswr2017.36.02【Lin, P.-H. (2017). ‘The Effect of Ecological Fitness of ProfessionalContinuing Education, Perceived Professional Support andProfessional Value on Professional Competence Among SocialWorkers in Taiwan’, NTU Social Work Review, 36: 47-96. doi:10.6171/ntuswr2017.36.02】

張如杏（2009）。〈台灣精神醫療社會工作專業發展與危機〉，《臺灣社會工作學刊》，第 6 期，頁 119-145。doi: 10.29814/TSW.200901.0004【Zhang, R.-H. (2009). ‘The Professional Development and Crisis in Psychiatric Social Work in Taiwan’, Taiwanese Social Work, 6:119-145. doi: 10.29814/TSW.200901.0004】

張倩恒（2020）。《培「伴」？培「半」？臺北市社區組織培力方案實踐經驗之探究》。臺灣師範大學社會工作學研究所碩士論文。doi: 10.6345/NTNU202000430【Zhang, Q.-H. (2020). Hub or Half? A Study on the Experience of Community Organization Empowerment Program in Taipei City. Unpublished dissertation, Taipei: National Taiwan NormalUniversity. doi: 10.6345/NTNU202000430】

許雅惠（2021）。〈社區發展的政策架構與議題：5 個選樣國家的分析及對我國的啟示〉，《台灣社區工作與社區研究學刊》，第 11卷第 1 期，頁 97-148。doi: 10.3966/222372402021041101003【Hsu, Y.-H. (2021). ‘The Trends of Community DevelopmentLegislation in 5 Countries and the Enlightenment to Taiwan’,Journal of Community Work and Community Studies, 11(1):97-148. doi: 10.3966/222372402021041101003】

主題瀏覽