透過您的圖書館登入
IP:18.223.172.149
  • 期刊

傘狀文獻回顧之評介

An Introductory Review of the Umbrella Review

摘要


有學者主張傘狀文獻回顧是證據等級最高的研究方法,然而目前臺灣似乎較缺乏完整的中文介紹。因此,本文之目的乃特別綜合最新的文獻,包含了更新版本的Joanna Briggs Institute、Cochrane Collaboration,以及其他三位學者的版本,針對傘狀文獻回顧進行評介,以提供讀者有關傘狀文獻回顧當前最即時與最全面的資訊。本文除了介紹傘狀文獻回顧事前(需求緣由、團隊組織、範疇/目標、定義變數、規範書)、進行中(標題及作者、問題研擬、簡介、回顧的問題、納入標準、搜尋策略、研究選擇、資料蒐集、方法論品質評判、資料摘要、結果報告、限制)、完成後(報告書)的內容、步驟、方法之外,還特別以「身體活動與學業成績」以及「身心障礙學生融入體育課的觀點」,這二篇傘狀文獻回顧作為量化與質性研究結果表格呈現的案例,提供讀者參考。本文結語:希望讓民眾能儘快運用此一方法至各種領域,做出以綜合證據為基礎的最佳決定,並制定最有效的指導方針。

並列摘要


Some scholars assert that conducting a synthesis of evidence from existing systematic reviews (an approach referred to as an umbrella review) is the research method with the highest level of evidence. At present, however, it seems there is no sufficient Chinese-language introduction to this subject in Taiwan. Therefore, the purpose of this article is to integrate the latest literature, including updated versions of Joanna Briggs Institute Reviewers' Manual, Cochrane Collaboration, and the versions of three other scholars, to provide an introductory overview of the most timely and comprehensive information about the umbrella review method. This article introduces the content, steps, and methods for conducting the umbrella review: beforehand (rationale for conducting review, team organization, scope/objective, variable definitions, and protocol), ongoing (title and author, question development, introduction, review questions, inclusion criteria, search strategies, study selection, data collection, methodological quality assessment, data summary, finding reports, and limitations), and after completion (report). In addition, two specific umbrella reviews ("Physical Activity and Academic Achievement" and "Perspectives on the Integration of Students with Disabilities in Physical Education") are used as examples of tabular presentation of the results of the quantitative and qualitative analyses relevant to sports research. In conclusion, it is hoped that various disciplines will soon begin utilizing this method, making optimal decisions based on synthesized evidence, and formulating the most effective practical guidelines.

參考文獻


Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J. P. T., & Rothstein, H. R. (2009). Introduction to metaanalysis. Chichester, UK: Wiley. doi:10.1002/9780470743386
de Greeff, J. W., Bosker, R. J., Oosterlaan, J., Visscher, C., & Hartman, E. (2018). Effects of physical activity on executive functions, attention and academic performance in preadolescent children: A meta-analysis. Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport, 21(5), 501-507. doi:10.1016/j.jsams.2017.09.595
Downs, S. H., & Black, N. (1998). The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological quality both of randomised and non-randomised studies of health care interventions. Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health, 52(6), 377-384. doi:10.1136/jech.52.6.377
Dudley, D., & Burden, R. (2020). What effect on learning does increasing the proportion of curriculum time allocated to physical education have? A systematic review and meta-analysis. European Physical Education Review, 26(1), 85-100. doi:10.1177/1356336X19830113
Ferreira-Vorkapic, C., Feitoza, J. M., Marchioro, M., Simões, J., Kozasa, E., & Telles, S. (2015). Are there benefits from teaching yoga at schools? A systematic review of randomized control trials of yoga-based interventions. Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine, 2015, 345835. doi:10.1155/2015/345835

延伸閱讀


國際替代計量