摘要
研究甲骨文，所面臨最基本的問題即在於甲骨卜辭的斷代。準確地判定甲骨片的時代，是一項非常複雜、棘手的工作，也是引起眾學者分歧屢見、爭論不休的議題。「歷組卜辭」時代的爭論，是甲骨斷代中繼「文武丁之謎」後的另一謎團，至今眾學者仍有不同的看法。就卜辭之字體、文例、人名、稱謂及同版現象等等條件來看，以董作賓先生為主的學者主張應屬武乙、文丁時期卜辭；然以李學勤先生為首的學者則以為歷組卜辭應是屬於武丁晚期至祖庚時期。本文在現今甲骨分類斷代研究中，依字體分類已普遍地受到甲骨學界重視的前提下，討論歷組卜辭字體中的字形結構、書體風格、用字習慣，以對此字體分類與時代問題作一探討。
並列摘要
The basic problem we face when we study oracle-bone inscriptions is to determine the era they belong to. It is a very complicated and difficult task to make the determination accurate. It is also a constant controversy among scholars. The debate about Li-zu oracle inscriptions is another mystery in era-determination after ＂the mystery of Wen-wu-ding＂. There are different opinions among scholars until today. A group of scholars, Mr. Zuo-bing Dong as main character, maintain that they belong to Wu-Yi or Wen-Ding Era according to the style of script, examples, names of people, appellation and the phenomenon of different style appearing on the same inscription. However, another group of scholars, Mr. Xue-qing Li as leading character, argue that they should belong to late Wu-ding to Zu-geng Era. In this article, under the assumption that script style classification as a studying method is well accepted among the field of studying bone inscriptions, the author will look at the structure of characters, the style of calligraphy and the usage of words to discuss the problem of style classification and era determination.
延伸閱讀
- 陳稼興、謝佳倫、許芳誠（2000）。以遺傳演算法為基礎的中文斷詞研究。資訊管理研究，2(2)，27-44。https://doi.org/10.6188/JEB.2000.2(2).02
- 巫雪如（2019）。從若干字詞用法談清華簡《繫年》的作者及文本構成。清華學報，49(2)，187-227。https://doi.org/10.6503/THJCS.201906_49(2).0001
- 胡倩華（2021）。出組卜旬卜辭分類研究。輔大中研所學刊，(42)，47-79。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=15610454-202111-202205050014-202205050014-47-79
- 羅永聖（2008）。結合多類型字典與條件隨機域之中文斷詞與詞性標記系統研究〔碩士論文，國立臺灣大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU.2008.01118
- 周國正（1994）。漢字結構及其表意方式探究。中國文化研究所學報，(新3)，113-143。https://doi.org/10.29708/JCS.CUHK.199401_(3).0006