並列摘要
The way ＂Tso Chuan＂ explain the classical texts is very different from ＂Kung Yang＂ and ＂Ku Liang＂. The most differences are not only the characteristic of its narration with the wonderful style of letter, but also the explanation of the text Chun Chiu＂ we concern most. This ＂None writing＂ of ＂Tso Chuan＂ provides the explanation of expounding the ＂great way＂ with subtle and profound language. In this chapter that follow I have written the text-example collection and analysis to the system of ＂None Written＂. Also, at the mercy of all text, I try to provide my intense observation of all its aspects. The two points above are the main frames of exposition. According to the exposition, the examples of ＂None Written＂ are divided into four parts, describing them one by one. At the end of this chapter, from analysis, I explain the three phenomena presenting in the ＂Tso Chuan＂. In an effort of my study, I hope it will give us a clear aspect of understanding the ＂Connotative Example＂ in ＂Chun Chiu＂.
延伸閱讀
- 張高評（2014）。比事屬辭與章學誠之《春秋》教：史學、敘事、古文辭與《春秋》書法。中山人文學報，(36)，31-58。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=10243131-201401-201405090005-201405090005-31-58
- 吳智雄（2004）。論左傳“君子曰”的道德意識－兼論“君子曰”的春秋書法觀念。國文學誌，(8)，377-396。https://doi.org/10.6973/CJ.200406.0377
- 劉德明（2017）。季本《春秋私考》研究－以對《左傳》的批評為核心。中國文哲研究集刊，(50)，101-135。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=10176462-201703-201712210007-201712210007-101-135
- 林義正（2006）。論中國經典詮釋的目的與方法－以《春秋》的詮釋為例。國立臺灣大學哲學論評，(32)，1-43。https://doi.org/10.6276/NTUPR.2006.10.(32).01
- 周啟榮（1990）。史學經世：試論章學誠《文史通義》獨缺〈春秋教〉的問題。歷史學報，(18)，169-182。https://doi.org/10.6243/BHR.1990.018.169