- 期刊
大學生交通安全教育介入效果實驗研究－以台北地區師範院校學生為例
an Experimental Study on the Effectiveness of Traffic Safety Education Among the Normal College and University Students in Taipei Area
摘要
本研究之目的在探討實施交通安全教育介入活動對台北地區師範院校學生的交通安全知識、交通安全態度及交通安全行為的影響。本研究採準實驗設計，以台北地區三所師範院校二年級學生共191人為研究對象，實驗組接受教學活動，而對照組則無。在進行教育介入前，二組接受前測，以作為評量實驗結果的比較基礎；經過三週教學結束後進行後測，以了解教學後的立即效果；二個月後再實施後後測，以追蹤教育介入後之短期效果。其結果顯示：（一）交通安全教育介入活動，能立即顯著增進師範院校學生的交通安全知識，且實驗組優於對照組。（二）交通安全教育介入活動，未能立即改變師範院校學生的交通安全態度。（三）交通安全教育介入活動，未能立即改進師範院校學生的交通安全行為。（四）交通安全教育介入二個月後，交通安全知識仍能持續，且實驗組仍優於對照組。（五）交通安全教育介入二個月後，交通安全態度的影響效果能顯現出來，其中實驗組的態度優於對照組。（六）交通安全教育介入二個月後，交通安全行為的影響效果能顯現出來，其中實驗組的行為優於對照組。（七）顯著影響研究對象之交通安全知識、交通安全態度及交通安全行為後測與後後測之因素各有不同。1.在後測方面：（1）交通安全知識前測可顯著預測交通安全知識後測。（2）交通安全態度前測可顯著預測交通安全態度後測。（3）交通安全行為前測與交通事故受傷情形兩個變項可顯著預測交通安全行為後測。2.在後後測方面：（1）交通安全知識後測可顯著預測交通安全知識後後測。（2）交通安全態度前測與交通安全態度後測可顯著預測交通安全態度後後測。（3）交通安全態度後測及後後測與交通安全行為前測及後測可顯著預測交通安全行為後後測。
並列摘要
The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of traffic safety instruction on improving the knowledge，attitudes and behaviors regarding traffic safety education among normal college and university students in Taipei Area. A quasi-experimental design was used in the study. One hundred and thirty seven sophomores from normal college and university in Taipei Area were selected as the sample. The experimental group was treated with three sessions of traffic safety instruction, while the control group was treated with nothing. Two groups were assessed by the questionnaires before the instruction. The result of the assessment was utilized as the base-line data for posttest and post posttest. The effect of intervention was evaluated by questionnaires after three sessions (posttest) and follow-up (post posttest) evaluation in the next two months. The important findings were as follows: l. It was found that the intervention enhanced the subjects: traffic safety knowledge significantly. In this aspect, the performance among the subjects in the experimental group was better then their counterparts. 2.The intervention had no significant influences on both groups attitudes toward traffic safety. 3.The intervention had significant effectiveness on changing the subjects' traffic safety behavior. 4.Two months after conducting the intervention, the subjects in both groups still had high level of traffic safety knowledge. Again, the performance among the subjects in the experimental group was better than that of control group. 5.The effectiveness of the intervention on the attitudes toward traffic safety was significant two months later. The subjects in the experimental group got higher score than their counterparts. 6.The effectiveness of the intervention on behavior regarding traffic safety was prominent two months after conducting the program. The subjects in the experimental group had better performance as compared to their counterparts. 7.The predicting factors on traffic safety knowledge, attitudes and behavior for the posttest and post posttest were mainly based on traffic safety knowledge, attitudes and behavior before and after instruction.