本文主要探討疾病、兵役、主題餐廳三項新興就業歧視爭議是否違法。而憲法、就服法、性平法、身心障礙者權益保障法及工會法與本研究主題相關。疾病並非我圓明文禁止歧視之項目,然慢性病等雖非與生俱來卻無法根治之疾病,與身心障礙本質無異,本文以為應儘速修法列入禁止歧視之項目,修法前禁止雇主無故探究勞工隱私之條文可為暫行措施。又雖非所有男性皆須服役,惟此負擔女性無需承受,則以役畢為招募標準,除因性別歧視違反就服法與性平法外,亦可能構成年齡歧視。男主題餐廳因形式上已違反現行法,則僅能個案認定是否符合其實職業資格,惟因欠缺雇主合法抗辯事由之完整規定,將致雇主雖可強調營業土之必要性,卻無直接正當化其催用措施之法律依據。
This article is about employment discrimination by disease, military service and themed restaurant. Employment discrimination by disease was not listed in Employment Service Act. Otherwise if chronic cannot be healed completely, there would be no different between chronic and disabled. Then chronic must considered to be one of Employment discrimination item in the future. Military service is not a obligation for all men's. It is not possible for women to carry this such burden. Therefore, finished military service as a recruitment prerequisite will violate anti-sexual employment discrimination. The themed restaurant will directly violate the anti-employment discrimination rule. The employer should maintain real vocational qualifications only if it determines case by case. But there is no complete rule of it.