未確認要保人身分而預收高額初期保費之人壽保險契約效力

The Validity of Life Insurance Contracts Where Insurers Receive Huge Initial Premiums without Verifying the Insured’s Identity

陳豐年(Feng-Nian Chen)

《法令月刊》 68卷5期 (2017/05) Pp. 91-107

https://doi.org/10.6509/TLM.2017.6805.04

摘要

近來，如何防制洗錢與對抗資助恐怖主義已成為國際保險監理之重大議題。國際保險官協會已發布一系列文件指導會員國制定相關內國法規。金管會對此乃發布保險業防制洗錢及打擊資助恐怖主義注意事項加以因應。然而，系爭注意事項內容與保險法施行細則第4條第3項顯有牴觸，致生適用疑義。本文主張，可將系爭注意事項第4點第1項解為民法第71條「禁止規定」，藉此達成統合公法屬性之系爭注意事項與私法屬性之保險契約法之規範目的。

關鍵字

洗錢與對抗資助恐怖主義 ； 國際保險監理官協會保險核心原則 ； 保險業防制洗錢及打擊資助恐怖主義注意事項 ； 客戶審查 ； 保險產業特有脆弱性

並列摘要

Anti-money laundering and combating the financing of terrorism, recently, have become burning issues of international insurance regulation. As a result, International Association of Insurance Supervisors has released Insurance Core Principle 22 (ICP 22) and related supervisory materials for the purpose of instructing members in enacting regulation. In response to the tide, Financial Supervisory Commission, R.O.C., launched Directions Governing Anti-Money Laundering and Countering Terrorism Financing of Insurance Sector (hereinafter the Directions). Nevertheless, two latent fissures pose a threat to the function of the Directions: on the one hand, the Directions’ position in hierarchy of sources of law is ambiguous; on the other hand, Paragraph 1 of Article 4 of the Directions is inconsistent with Paragraph 3 of Article 4 of Enforcement Rules for Insurance Act. This study argues that the Directions falls within the category of Regulation, which is authorized by laws. Also, Paragraph 1 of Article 4 of the Directions should trump Paragraph 3 of Article 4 of Enforcement Rules for Insurance Act.

並列關鍵字

Anti-Money Laundering and Combating the Financing of Terrorism ； IAIS Insurance Core Principle ； Directions Governing Anti-Money Laundering and Countering Terrorism Financing of Insurance Sector ； Customer Due Diligence ； Vulnerabilities in Insurance

參考文獻

葉啟洲(2015)，《保險法實例研習》，4 版。臺北:元照。


黃茂榮(2006)，《法學方法與現代民法》，增訂 5 版。臺北:自版。

黃國昌(2010)，《民事訴訟理論之新開展》。臺北:元照。

葉啟洲(2007)，〈從保險單、預收保險費論保險人之締約過失責任— 保險法施行細則第二十五條及最高 法院六十九年度台上字第三一五三 號判例評釋〉，《保險法專題研究(一)》，頁 161-194。

王澤鑑(2014)，《民法總則》，增訂 新版。臺北:自版。