司法院釋字第748號解釋確立憲法第22條婚姻自由的核心內容,使得同性性傾向者的婚姻自由(同性婚姻)成為憲法第22條未列舉基本權利。在此背景下,本文以司法院釋字第748號解釋為例來論證,如何從憲法第22條規定中,推導出未列舉基本權利。按司法院釋字第748號解釋意旨,憲法第22條未列舉基本權利之詮釋,應從人性尊嚴與人格自由發展之維護出發,而「不妨害社會秩序公共利益」要件僅具有宣示性質,該要件將在違憲審查過程中之目的合憲性審查及手段與目的關聯性審查,予以處理。在此脈絡下,憲法第22條未列舉基本權利的「發現」或「創造」植基於釋憲者的憲法解釋,使得憲法能與時俱進且具有生命力,以回應新興權利時代的到來。
The J.Y. Interpretation No. 748 establishes the core of the freedom of marriage in Article 22 of the Constitution, so that the freedom of marriage of homosexuals (same-sex marriage) becomes the non-listed basic right under Article 22 of the Constitution. In the background, this article uses the J.Y. Interpretation No. 748 as an example to demonstrate how to derive non-listed basic rights from the provision of Article 22 of the Constitution. According to the J.Y. Interpretation No. 748, the explanation of non-listed basic rights under Article 22 of the Constitution should be based on the maintenance of human dignity and the freedom of development of personality. The element of "not offending the social order or public interests", which has only declarative nature, is processed under review for the constitutionality of the purpose and for the relationship between the means and the ends in judicial review procedure. In this context, the "discovery" or "creation" of non-listed basic rights under Article 22 of the Constitution is based on the constitutional interpretation of the Justices of the Constitutional Court, so that the Constitution can advance with the times and be viable in response to the arrival of the era of emerging rights.