本研究旨在瞭解2017年臺北世界大學運動會跆拳道對打金牌選手與臺灣選手在技術動作的表現及差異性。研究方法針對2017年臺北世界大學運動會進行個案分析,並採用三角交叉檢視,透過相關研究的結果、選手的比賽影片分析及教練的訪談結果,將此資料進行比較及詮釋。研究結果得知:一、金牌選手得分較集中於旋踢動作,臺灣選手得分技術較為分散。二、金牌選手在得失分組合的得分前3高都是旋踢技術動作,且敗方皆無法以手部防禦及移位來躲避金牌選手攻擊。三、臺灣選手得失分模式習慣以引誘對手技術動作出來後再予以攻擊。四、在側踩及下壓等直線性技術動作其得失分皆為0。本研究結論:一、優質的單一技術優於技術多樣化。二、金牌選手在時機的掌握及速度的表現應優於其他選手。三、臺灣選手若降低試探性動作、搭配直接得分的技術動作,可能減緩體能下降,提升得分表現。四、採用側踩及下壓等直線性技術動作不易有分數產生,可作為戰術運用參考。
The purpose of this study was to compare the technical differences of taekwondo Kyorugi between gold medalists and Taiwanese players at the Taipei 2017 Summer Universiade. This study conducted case studies of taekwondo matches between gold medalists and Taiwanese players at the 2017 Summer Universiade. By applying triangulation method with the related researches, video contents, and interviews with the coaches, this study presented the patterns of gained and lost scores with descriptive statistics and frequency distribution to compare the differences between players. The results showed that: (1) Gold medalists focused on roundhouse kicks to score, while Taiwanese players varied in diverse attack techniques. (2) The highest three patterns of gained and lost scores of gold medalists are composed of roundhouse kick, and the lost players could not effectively dodge the attacks from the gold medalists. (3) Taiwanese players tend to do the counter attacks after inducing the opponents to attack first. (4) The combinations of linear attacks like side kick and axe kick scores were zero. We conclude that: (1) Mono attack skill with excellent timing surpasses the versatility of attack techniques. (2) Gold medalists should have good timing and possess better agility over other players. (3) By reducing the probing movements and introducing more direct score techniques, Taiwanese players might defer physical decline and promote scoring performance at the same time. (4) It is more difficult to score with the combinations of linear attacks like side kick and axe kick, and it can be a consideration for tactics.