不同週期訓練模式對健力表現之影響

Effects of Different Periodization Models on Powerlifting Performance

翁明嘉(Ming-Chia Weng) ； 陳哲修(Che-Hsiu Chen) ； 陳昕(Hsin Chen)

《大專體育學刊》 24卷1期 (2022/03) Pp. 83-101

https://doi.org/10.5297/ser.202203_24(1).0006

摘要

本研究旨在比較共軛週期模式（conjugate periodizaton model, CPM）與線性週期模式（linear periodization model, LPM）對健力表現之影響。招募17名健康男性運動員為研究對象，分成3天進行蹲舉、臥舉、硬舉三項最大肌力與輔助動作測驗；依三項總和與自身體重計算出維京分數。測驗後休息1週，隨機分為兩組（LPM與CPM）進行8週實驗，每週進行4天。比較CPM與LPM對健力三項最大肌力、維京分數、三項總和與進步程度（後測成績減前測成績）；並各別比較CPM與LPM在實際總訓練量（強度×次數×組數）與自覺訓練量的差異性。研究結果顯示兩種週期訓練模式均能顯著提升健力三項總和差異程度；但LPM在健力三項總和差異表現與硬舉差異表現皆顯著優於CPM。再者，維京分數未具顯著差異。CPM也僅在第8週的總訓練量（強度×次數×組數）顯著高於LPM。雖然CPM在自覺疲勞程度有較低趨勢，但與LPM未達顯著差異。本研究結論：雖然CPM與LPM均明顯提升健力三項總和成績；但LPM更能提升硬舉表現，因此LPM似乎更有利於提升選手健力表現。

關鍵字

共軛週期模式 ； 線性週期模式 ； 維京分數

並列摘要

This study aimed to investigate the effects of conjugate periodization model (CPM) and linear periodization model (LPM) on powerlifting performance in athletes. Seventeen physically active male athletes were recruited into this study. The one-repetition maximum (1 RM) test, consisting three core lifting exercise of Squat (SQ), Bench Press (BP), Deadlift (DL), and auxiliary exercises, was completed at baseline and after 8 weeks. Wilks points were calculated using the sum of the core exercises and body weight. Seven days after pretesting, all participants were randomly assigned into LPM or CPM groups, and performed the assigned periodization training model 4 days per week for a period of 8 weeks. CPM and LPM have been compared in term of their estimation of maximum strength of three core exercises, Wilks points, total volume, and progress (post minus pre). In addition, the differences between the CPM and LPM in training load (intensity × repetition × set) and rating of perceived exertion (RPE) were analyzed. The results showed that both LPM and CPM significantly improved the sum of load difference in three core exercises. Nevertheless, in the sum of load difference and in DL performance, the LPM was significantly more effective than the CPM. However, in Wilks points, no significant difference was observed. Furthermore, for total training load (intensity × repetition × volume), CPM results were significantly higher than the LPM results only in the eighth week. No significant difference was observed between the groups in session RPE; however, the CPM exhibited a slightly lower tendency. Based on these findings, we concludes that LPM and CPM improve the sum of load difference in three core lifting exercises. However, LPM has additional effect on deadlift performance of athletes. Therefore, LPM appears to be more beneficial for powerlifters on powerlifting performance.

並列關鍵字

conjugate periodization model ； linear periodization model ； Wilks points

參考文獻

林依雯、陳五洲（2011）。一次反覆最大重量之最大肌力探討。臺灣體育論壇，2 期，59-69 頁。doi:10.6592/TSF.2011.03.07 [Lin, Y.-W., & Chen, W.-C. (2011). A study of onerepetition maximum muscular strength. Taiwan Sports Forum, 2, 59-69. doi:10.6592/TSF.2011.03.07]

詹華蓁、江杰穎（2017）。RPE 訓練衝量法在運動訓練與監控之應用：系統性回顧。運動表現期刊，4 卷 2 期，87-97 頁。doi:10.3966/240996512017120402003 [Chan, H.-C., & Chiang, C.-Y. (2017). Application of session-RPE in sport training and monitoring: A systematic review. Journal of Sports Performance, 4(2), 87-97. doi:10.3966/240996512017120402003]

Swinton, P. A., Lloyd, R., Agouris, I., & Stewart, A. (2009). Contemporary training practices in elite british powerlifters: Survey results from an international competition. The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 23(2), 380-384. doi:10.1519/JSC.0b013e31819424bd

Thompson, B. J., Stock, M. S., Shields, J. E., Luera, M. J., Munayer, I. K., Mota, J. A., ... Olinghouse, K. D. (2015). Barbell deadlift training increases the rate of torque development and vertical jump performance in novices. The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 29(1), 1-10. doi:10.1519/JSC.0000000000000691

Vanderburgh, P. M., & Batterham, A. M. (1999). Validation of the Wilks powerlifting formula. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 31(12), 1869-1875. doi:10.1097/00005768-199912000-00027