透過您的圖書館登入
IP:18.227.107.69
  • 期刊

SSRN文學研究網絡之預行本作者及其預行本出版探討

Author Affiliation and Preprint Publication on the SSRN Literature Research Network

摘要


雖然愈來愈多自然科學、社會科學學科開始使用預行本,人文學預行本之發展卻未受到關注。為此,本研究以1997至2020年間發表在SSRN文學研究網絡之1,734篇預行本為研究對象,發現跨領域文學及傳統文學2大類預行本數量均自2007年起明顯成長,而發表預行本的1,376位作者係來自25個學科,隸屬75個國家之676個機構,僅有6位作者同時發表跨領域文學及傳統文學預行本,但皆為發表8至100篇之高產量作者。跨領域文學預行本以法律與文學主題為主,因此作者大多來自法律學科,不同於傳統文學預行本以語言文學作者為最多。此外,跨領域文學預行本之出版率(36.6%)略高於傳統文學預行本(31.8%),但傳統文學預行本比跨領域文學預行本更明顯偏好以期刊文章形式出版(88.7%vs.77.3%)。

關鍵字

SSRN 文學 法律與文學 預行本

並列摘要


With the increasing embrace of preprints by scientific and social science disciplines, the humanities have garnered comparatively less attention in their development. This study targeted 1,734 preprints uploaded on the SSRN Literature Research Network between 1997 and 2020. The findings reveal substantial preprint growth in both traditional and interdisciplinary literature categories since 2007. A total of 1,376 authors were identified as affiliated with 676 institutions across 75 countries and represented 25 disciplines. Only 6 authors shared preprints in both interdisciplinary and traditional literature, but they were productive, contributing 8-100 preprints. Law authors dominated interdisciplinary literature preprints because most preprints were related to law and literature. This differed in that language and literature authors predominantly shared preprints in traditional literature. Additionally, there is a slightly higher publication rate in interdisciplinary literature preprints than in traditional literature preprints (36.6% vs. 31.8%). Traditional literature preprints showed a significantly higher preference for publishing in the format of journal articles compared to interdisciplinary literature preprints (88.7% vs. 77.3%).

並列關鍵字

SSRN Literature Law and Literature Preprint

參考文獻


吳紹群、陳雪華(2011)。人文學專書出版問題對學術傳播之影響。大學圖書館,15(2),39-61。https://doi.org/10.6146/univj.2011.15-2.03【Wu, Shao-Chun & Chen, Hsueh-Hua (2011). Issue of monograph publishing in the humanities and its impact on scholarly communication. University Library Quarterly, 15(2), 39-61. https://doi.org/10.6146/univj.2011.15-2.03 (in Chinese)】
黃慕萱、張郁蔚(2006)。人文社會學者學術評鑑指標之探討。圖書資訊學刊,4(1/2),17-47。https://doi.org/10.6182/jlis.2006.4(1.2).017【Huang, Mu-Hsuan & Chang, Yu-Wei (2006). Performance indicators for evaluation of humanities and social sciences researchers. Journal of Library & Information Studies, 4(1/2), 17-47. https://doi.org/10.6182/jlis.2006.4(1.2).017 (in Chinese)】
Baumann, A., & Wohlrabe, K. (2020). Where have all the working papers gone? Evidence from four major economics working paper series. Scientometrics, 124(3), 2433-2441. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03570-x
Bhalla, N. (2016). Has the time come for preprints in biology? Molecular Biology of the Cell, 27(8), 1185-1187. https://doi.org/10.1091/mbc.E16-02-0123
Björk, B.-C., & Solomon, D. (2013). The publishing delay in scholarly peer reviewed journals. Journal of Informetrics, 7(4), 914-923. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2013.09.001

延伸閱讀