透過您的圖書館登入
IP:18.191.46.36
  • 期刊

區分性教學視導在教師專業發展上的運用與啟示

The Application and Enlightenment of Differentiated Instructional Supervision on Teachers' Professional Development

摘要


教育視導與教師的專業成長與學生的學習表現息息相關,也是有效能的學校領導的主要任務,因此學校領導者應關心教育視導與評鑑趨勢,並帶動教師的專業成長。教育視導分為行政視導與教學視導,本文重點在教學視導,從教學視導的歷史演進出發,簡介教學視導常見模式,進而介紹Glatthorn所提區分性視導的理論基礎、選用模式、理由及運作實施的基礎,並就文獻資料探討區分性視導在教學視導與評鑑上的運用,以美國及沙烏地阿拉伯的案例進行分析,最後提出其在我國教師專業發展上面的啟示。

並列摘要


Educational supervision and teachers' professional growth are closely related to students' performance and are also the main task of effective school leaders. Therefore, school leaders should be concerned about educational supervision trends and encourage teachers' professional growth. Educational supervision is divided into administrative supervision and instructional supervision. This article focuses on instructional supervision. This research starts from the historical evolution of supervision, then introduces common models of supervision, especially on differentiated supervision presented by Glatthorn, including the theoretical basis, selection modes and reasons. The researcher also introduced the cases of differentiated supervision in the United States and Saudi Arabia based on the literature. Finally, the researcher concluded that Glatthorn's differentiated supervision is helpful for teachers' professional growth and development.

參考文獻


丁一顧(2009)。區分化教師評鑑及對我國教師專業發展評鑑的啟示。中等教育,第60卷第2期,頁8‒19。
台北市政府教育局(2018)。臺北市107年度市立高級中等以下學校教學輔導教師及研究教師設置方案。搜尋於臺北市教學輔導教師網-教學輔導教師在臺北,網頁http://mt.utaipei.edu.tw/2018/12/10/%e8%87%ba%e5%8c%97%e5%b8%82107%e5%b9%b4%e5%ba%a6%e5%b8%82%e7%ab%8b%e9%ab%98%e7%b4%9a%e4%b8%ad%e7%ad%89%e4%bb%a5%e4%b8%8b%e5%ad%b8%e6%a0%a1%e6%95%99%e5%ad%b8%e8%bc%94%e5%b0%8e%e6%95%99%e5%b8%ab/
台北市政府教育局(2018)。臺北市107學年度教師專業發展實踐方案。搜尋於臺北市教學輔導教師網-教學輔導教師在臺北,網頁http://mt.utaipei.edu.tw/2018/12/10/%e8%87%ba%e5%8c%97%e5%b8%82107%e5%b9%b4%e5%ba%a6%e5%b8%82%e7%ab%8b%e9%ab%98%e7%b4%9a%e4%b8%ad%e7%ad%89%e4%bb%a5%e4%b8%8b%e5%ad%b8%e6%a0%a1%e6%95%99%e5%ad%b8%e8%bc%94%e5%b0%8e%e6%95%99%e5%b8%ab/
方朝郁、方德隆(2017)。教師評鑑2.0:美國的經驗與對台灣的啟示。教育研究與發展期刊,13(1),頁31-62。
李寶琳(2013)。美國不讓任何孩子落後法案政策的績效責任探討與省思。臺北市立大學學報,45(1),頁1‒20。

被引用紀錄


黃嘉莉、謝傳崇(2022)。為何教師專業發展活動不有效?TALIS 2018臺灣國中教師調查結果之羅吉斯驗證教育科學研究期刊67(1),1-32。https://doi.org/10.6209/JORIES.202203_67(1).0001

延伸閱讀