透過您的圖書館登入
IP:3.17.154.171
  • 期刊

不同體感操控介面對搜尋及閃躲任務之遊戲經驗比較研究-以遊戲相關設計科系背景的學生為例

A Comparative Study on Game Experience of Searching & Dodging Missions between Different Control Interfaces-Design Major College Students as an Example.

摘要


近年來,當電玩遊戲內容與視覺效果逐漸提升的同時,科技與創意也帶動遊戲操控介面的變革,然而,在遊戲操控介面演進的同時,不僅代表著人機介面的進化,更改變了人們對於遊戲的觀念與型態,從2006年任天堂公司的Wii推出之後,遊戲操控介面開始進入體感操控的時代,2010年10月微軟推出不需要任何外部裝置輔助就能進行遊戲的Kinect。因此,本研究應用與Kinect原理相近的光點辨識技術及Wii控制器兩種操控介面,以實地實驗法及問卷調查法對82位遊戲相關設計科系背景的受測者進行研究,探討不同操控介面對於搜尋及閃躲任務遊戲經驗之差異,以及操控介面對於遊戲事後經驗之差異等二個研究目的。研究結果發現,透過較少外部裝置輔助的光點操控介面,較Wii控制器操控介面能增加身體活動的能圈,更能增加玩家在遊戲中的專注程度、沉浸程度,並提高挑戰性及帶來的較佳正面情緒;同時,也提高玩家在遊戲事後經驗的疲倦感及回到現實的感覺,並有著較佳的正面經驗。綜合以上推論,在搜尋及閃躲類遊戲中,可以預期不透過外部裝置輔助的遊戲操控介面,將成為未來遊戲操控介面發展的趨勢。

並列摘要


In recent years, when the content and visual effect of digital game are quickly boosted, the interface of digital game has also been evolved by technology and innovation. This evolution not only represents the development of Human-Computer Interaction but also changes user's concept of digital games. Since Nintendo Wii was invented in 2006, the digital game interface has evolved into a Physical Interactive era. Microsoft released Xbox360 Kinect in 2010, with which people can play games without any external devices. Therefore, in this study two different interfaces of Physical Interactive were explored. One is called light spot recognition technology to substitute for Project Natal, and the other is Nintendo Wiimote. In this study we also conducted the comparison of game experience between two interfaces, the comparison of game experience on mission of searching and dodging with different levels of game, and the comparison of post-game experience between two interfaces by 82 design major college students as subjects.According to results of this study, the subjects who play games by light spot interface not only have more freedom to control than those who play by Wiimote interface, but they also can perform significantly better in ”Flow”, ”Immersion”, ”Challenge”, ”Positive affect”, ”Tiredness”,”Returning to reality”, and ”Positive experience” elements during playing games. In addition, the higher degrees of difficulty of game will increase the level of ”Flow”, ”Immersion”, ”Challenge”, ”Positive affect”, but decrease the level of ”Negative affect” elements. Therefore, it is expectable that the interface of digital game without external devices will become the main stream of game development.

參考文獻


Csikszentmihalyi, M.(1990).Flow: The psychology of optimal experience.New York, NY:Harper Perennial.
Chou, T. J.,Ting, C. C.(2003).The role of flow experience in cyber-game addiction.CyberPsychology and Behavior.6(6),663-675.
Gilleade, K. M.,Dix, A.,Allanson, J.(2005).Affective videogames and modes of affective gaming: Assist me, challenge me, emote me.Proceedings of DiGRA 2005: Changing Views-Worlds in Play.(Proceedings of DiGRA 2005: Changing Views-Worlds in Play).:
Grimshaw, M.,Lindley, C. A.,Nacke, L.(2008).Sound and immersion in the first-person shooter: mixed measurement of the player's sonic experience.Proceedings of Audio Mostly, Conference on Interaction with Sound.(Proceedings of Audio Mostly, Conference on Interaction with Sound).:
Howland, G. (1998). Game design: The essence of computer games. Retrieved Sept 17, 2010, from: http://www.techcorn.com/TechCorner.dll/FileViewer?fid=56

被引用紀錄


石孟穎(2017)。不同互動形式對參與者經驗影響比較之研究〔碩士論文,國立臺中科技大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0061-2508201703494200
趙翊如(2017)。投影規模對沉浸經驗之影響〔碩士論文,國立臺中科技大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0061-2408201704024900

延伸閱讀