透過您的圖書館登入
IP:3.129.23.30
  • 期刊

數理資優鑑定實作評量之試題研發曁效度評估

Conducting the Performance Assessment for Mathematically and Scientifically Giftedness Identification

摘要


本研究旨在發展適用數理資優鑑定的實作評量,以提供有效篩選數理學術性向資賦優異學生之測量工具。研究者邀集數學與自然科學領域專家以及資優班現場教師共同編製數理領域實作評量,共11題。首先,以49位國中一年級學生進行預試,依各試題內部一致性之結果挑選出六道題目(數學科與自然科各三題)為正式試題。接著,以150名學術性向測驗百分等級97以上的國中一年級學生進行正式施測及信效度檢驗。結果發現,各試題內部一致性信度介於.46至.96,數學與自然分測驗分別為.77與.61,整體實作評量則為.77。數學科與自然科之相關係數為.40,顯示各科具有良好區別性。研究者採用受測者下一學年之學科成績為效標變項,分析結果指出:實作評量分數可顯著正向預測數學科(r = .29~.40)與自然科成績(r = .20~.25),表示本實作評量能有效預測受測者後續在數理科目之學業表現。本研究亦於文末針對測驗信效度以及未來相關應用提出討論與建議。

並列摘要


The study is aimed to conduct the performance assessment for identifying the mathematically and scientifically giftedness (PAMSG). 11 items of performance assessment was developed by the experts and gifted class teachers in the mathematics and sciences field. 49 junior high students participated the pre-test of PAMSG. Six items was selected as formal test according to the higher internal-consistent coefficients. We recruited 150 junior high students whose score of scholastic aptitude test above 97 percentage rank join the formal test. As for the reliability, the coefficients of internal consistency for mathematical and scientific sub-test were .77 and .61, for integrated test was .77. The correlation coefficients between the two sub-tests was .40, indicating the internal discriminant validity. The score of PAMSG positively predicted the subsequent academic performance of the mathematics and sciences discipline. We have discussed the reliability and validity of the PAMSG, and provided the potential application.

參考文獻


曲慧娟(2006)。實作評量在國中學術性向優異班招生鑑定之效度研究:以臺灣北區為例(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。
余民寧(2008)。教育測驗與評量:成就測驗與教學評量。臺北市:心理。
吳清山、林天祐(1996)。實作評量。2011 年3 月16 日,取自http://w2nioeraredutw/basis3/15/gi17-1htm
王文中、呂金燮、吳毓瑩、張郁雯、張淑慧(1999)。教育測驗與評量:教室學習觀點。臺北市:五南。
呂金燮(2000)。資優兒童問題解決能力實作評量之建構研究。特殊教育研究學刊。19,279-308。

延伸閱讀