中文版簡式「五大人格量表」BFI的發展

為了在有限時間內完成多種測驗，並增加受試者的合作意願，簡式量表的需求乃逐漸升高。本研究針對44題的「五大人格量表」（Big Five Inventory, BFI）（簡稱BFI-44）進行中文翻譯及其簡式版發展，並以生活滿意度、心理幸福感、正負向情感及自尊作為效標。以兩群臺灣大學生為樣本，第一群樣本730人用來看BFI-44的信效度及進行簡式版的選題，並提供內部一致性信度、建構效度、聚合效度、區辨相關以及效標關聯效度等訊息，第二群樣本732人用來驗證BFI-15簡式版的模型適配度，以及獲得BFI-44及簡式版的另一部分效標關聯效度訊息。簡式版BFI-15是在結構方程式模型的測量模型架構下，參考五項選題規則所選出的，每一種人格向度各3題，共15題。研究結果發現：（1）BFI-15與BFI-44在對應的五大人格上之相關介於.80～.90，顯示BFI-15 的試題內涵在一定程度上可代表BFI-44；（2）BFI-15的驗證性因素分析模型適配度佳，因素負荷量除兩題為.44 及.48外，其餘在.64～.87之間，聚合效度佳，因素間經檢定後也具區辨性；（3）BFI-44及BFI-15與各效標的相關組型一致，也與文獻結果相似；（4）BFI-44及BFI-15皆與TDA「五大人格量表」在對應人格上有中高度相關，聚合效度佳；（5）BFI-44各人格向度之內部一致性信度α介於.73～.83，而BFI-15介於.67～.81。此外，BFI-15的組合信度介於.69～.81。

關鍵字

BFI五大人格量表；信效度；簡式版本

並列摘要

In order to administrate many scales in a short time and to increase willing of participants to fill in them, a need of short scales is increasing. This study aimed to develop a Chinese translation version of 44-item BFI (Big Five Inventory), named BFI-44, and then to make its shortened version BFI-15 with criteria, such as satisfaction of life, psychological well-being, positive and negative emotion, and self-esteem. Two university student samples were collected in Taiwan. One sample with 730 students data was used to obtain reliability and validity of the translated BFI-44 Chinese version, and to make item selection for BFI-15 with internal consistency reliability, construct validity, convergent validity, discriminant validity, and criterion-related validity. The other sample with 732 students data was used to confirm model-fit of BFI-15 and to offer the other criterion-related validities of BFI-44 and BFI-15. Items in the BFI-15 were selected according to five rules under measurement model of the structural equation model. 3 items in each personality subscale were selected, and totally 15 items were included in the shortened version. The results showed that (1) Correlation coefficients were .80-.90 in the corresponding personality between BFI-44 and BFI-15, indicating BFI-15 a good representative of BFI-44; (2) Good model-fits and good convergent validities with .64- .87 factor loadings except for two items with .44 and .48. Discrimination was also among five personality traits; (3) Correlation patterns for BFI-44 and BFI-15 with criteria were consistent and also similar to past studies; (4) BFI-44 and BFI-15 both had high correlation coefficients with TDA big five personality scale, showing good convergent validities; (5) Internal consistent reliability s were .73-.83 for BFI-44, and .67-.81 for BFI-15. Besides, composite reliabilities were .69-.81 for BFI-15.

並列關鍵字

Big Five Inventory ； Reliability and Validity ； Shortened Version

參考文獻

李仁豪、陳怡君（2016）。IPIP 五大人格量表簡版的發展及其跨年齡層的測量不變性檢定。教育研究與發展，12（4），87-120。doi:10.3966/181665042016121204004

陳依芬、黃金蘭、林以正（2011）。忍的情緒調控策略與心理適應之關聯。本土心理學研究，35，3-56。doi:10.6254/2011.35.3

鄧景宜、曾旭民、李怡禎、游朝舜（2011）。“International English Big-Five MiniMarkers ”之繁體中文版量表發展。管理學報，28（6），579-615。doi:10.6504/JOM.2011.28.06.04

Bentler, P. M. (1992). On the fit of models to covariances and methodology to the Bulletin. Psychological Bulletin, 112(3), 400-404. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.112.3.400

Bentler, P. M., Jackson, D. N., & Messick, S. (1971). Identification of content and style: A two-dimensional interpretation of acquiescence. Psychological Bulletin, 76(3), 186-204. doi:10.1037/h0031474

國際替代計量

中文版簡式「五大人格量表」BFI的發展

全文下載

主題瀏覽