透過您的圖書館登入
IP:18.223.196.59
  • 期刊

「臺灣中小學輔導人員施為行動短式量表」之發展與分析

Validation and Analysis of Elementary and Secondary School Counselor's Agency Behavior Short-Form Scale

摘要


本研究之目的在發展「臺灣中小學輔導人員施為行動短式量表」,期能以最經濟效益方式,提高對臺灣中小學輔導人員施為展能的評估,增進助人工作的培力效能。研究對象為578名中小學輔導人員,將原「施為行動量表」之37題,以多向度RSM研究方法精簡為21題,其中包括:倡議行動分量表(AA)5題、施為參與分量表(AE)5題、團隊合作分量表(TW)3題、創意行為分量表(CB)5題、自發投入分量表(OCB)3題,其受試者分離信度分別是.87、.86、.81、.88、.84。本研究進一步針對短版之「施為行動量表」提供內容、結構、類推、解釋、本質效度證據,以及群體間之差異比較。「施為行動量表」之長短版二者之相關為.98,而五個分量表之相關分別為.93、.94、.95、.99、.89,顯示均為高度相關,可見本研究發展之短式量表足以代替原始量表,未來可將此量表廣泛地應用於中小學輔導人員之培育、訓練與專業動能評估。

並列摘要


The purpose of this study was to develop "Taiwan Elementary and Secondary School Counselor Agent Behavior Short-Form Scale" (hereinafter referred to as SCABSF) to improve the efficiency of Taiwan elementary and secondary school counselors' practice assessment in the most economical and effective way, and to enhance the effectiveness of their work. The participants were 578 elementary and secondary school counselors. The original 37 items of the SCAB were streamlined into 21 items using the multidimensional RSM method, so the SCAB-SF included five dimensions: advocacy action (AA; 5 items), agent engagement (AE; 5 items), teamwork (TW; 3 items), creative behavior (CB; 5 items) and organizational citizenship behaviors (OCB; 3 items). The person-separation reliabilities of the measures from five dimensions were .87, .86, .81, .88, and .84, respectively. In this study, they were applied to assess model-data fit and provide the further evidence of content, structure, analogy, interpretation, and intrinsic validity for SCAB-SF, as well as comparison of difference between groups. In addition, the significant positive correlation between length version and short version of the SCAB was .98, and the correlations of the five subscales were .93, .94, .95, .99, and .89. The results indicated that the SCAB-SF could be replaced with the original scale. In the future, the SCAB-SF can be more widely used in the training, training and professional motivation of elementary and secondary school counselors.

參考文獻


王文中(1997)。測驗的建構:因素分析還是 Rasch 分析?調查研究,3,129-166。https://doi.org/10.7014/TCYC.199704.0129
王麗斐、杜淑芬(2009)。臺北市國小輔導人員與諮商心理師之有效跨專業合作研究。教育 心理 學報,41(3),295-320。https://doi.org/10.6251/BEP.20090402
吳佳芬(2019)。尊重幼兒主體性的參與式研究:馬賽克法。科學與人文研究,7(1),65-77。https://doi.org/10.6535/JSH.201911_7(1).0003
林俊瑩、李湘凌、楊皓、劉雅萍、鍾宜真(2013)。學前教師專業成長行為的特殊性與其影響機制:與其他教育階段教師的比較。課程與教學,16(4),183-207。https://doi.org/10.6384/CIQ.201310_16(4).0007
胡中宜(2011)。學校社會工作實務中的倫理兩難。教育心理學報,42(4),543-566。https://doi.org/10.6251/BEP.20091124

延伸閱讀