透過您的圖書館登入
IP:3.135.217.228
  • 期刊

教師專業發展評鑑之政策脈絡分析

Analysis on the Policy Context of Teacher Profession Development Evaluation

摘要


台灣自90年代推動教改以來,提升教師專業素質成為各界所關注的重要議題之一,故自1996年教改總諮議報告書提到規劃教師專業評鑑制度起,提升教師專業及推動教師評鑑是歷年來教育政策的重點,其間雖有相關的推動計畫與試辦方案,但至2006年所公布的「教育補助試辦教師專業發展評鑑實施計畫」,對於教師專業發展與評鑑才有較明確的政策文本。因此,政策從形成到制定並非是水到渠成的,而是變動的非線性歷程,為使政策脈絡能有清楚的輪廓,本文運用Ball(1994)的政策社會學分析取向,即「政策作為一種文本」(policy as text)與「政策作為一種論述」(policy as discourse),檢視「教育補助試辦教師專業發展評鑑實施要點」的政策脈絡,嘗試探討:一,什麼樣的社會脈絡促使教師評鑑成為教育改革的重要議題。二,政策文本的轉變反映出某些意識型態與團體的互動歷程,其結果對政策有何影響。三,教師專業發展評鑑實質上達成什麼。四,根據脈絡分析的結果,提出對於教師專業發展評鑑後續發展的啟示。

並列摘要


Since education reform was promoted in the 1990s in Taiwan, the enhancement of the professional quality of teachers has become one of the important issues that arouse public concern. Therefore, since the planning of the system for the professional evaluation of teachers was mentioned in the General Consultation Report for Education Reform in 1996, the enhancement of teachers' profession and the promotion of teacher evaluation have become of focuses of educational policy over the years. Although relevant promotion plans and pilot projects were executed before, not until the ”Ministry of Education Granted Project for the Pilot Implementation of Teacher Profession Evaluation” was announced in 2006 did the specific policy text of teacher evaluation for professional development appear. Therefore, the formation and formulation of policy is not a matter of time but a changing nonlinear process. To make the outline of policy context clearer, this paper refers to Ball's(1994) approaches of policy sociology analysis, namely ”policy as text” and ”policy as discourse”, to examine the policy context of the ”Ministry of Education Granted Project for the Pilot Implementation of Teacher Profession Evaluation”. This paper aims to answer the following questions: (1) what is the social context that drives teacher evaluation to become an important issue of education reform; (2) what is the influence of the outcome of the interactive process of certain ideology or groups reflected by the transformation on policy; (3) what has the teacher evaluation for professional development substantially achieved and what are their influences on policy; (4) the inspiration of teacher evaluation for professional development to follow-up development based on the results of the analysis on context.

參考文獻


王毓秀(2007)。國民小學教師對教師專業發展評鑑認知之研究─以花蓮縣爲例(碩士論文)。國立花蓮教育大學教育行政與管理學系。
王麗雲(2006)。教育研究應用─教育研究、政策與實務的銜接。台北:心理。
全國教師會(2001)。全國教師會電子報1784期。2009年12月11日,取自http://www.maillist.com.tw/maillist/maillist_browse.cgi?maillist_id=nta mail
朱玉仿、朱麒華、陳清溪、蔡明學(2008)。2007年台灣地區民眾對重要教育議題看法之調查研究。教育研究與發展期刊。4(3),21-52。
行政院教育改革審議委員會(1995)。第二期諮議報告書。台北:行政院教育改革審議委員會。

被引用紀錄


林昕瑾(2016)。臺北市國民中學教師專業成長與班級經營效能關係之研究〔碩士論文,淡江大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6846/TKU.2016.00694
蘇偉智(2015)。我國公立高級中等以下教師專業自主權與教師評鑑制度〔碩士論文,國立暨南國際大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6837/NCNU.2015.00059
葛惠敏(2018)。科技大學教師專業背景、教師教學表現與學生學習成就之關聯:階層線性模式分析〔博士論文,國立臺灣師範大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6345/DIS.NTNU.DTAHRD.042.2018.F06
姚招帆(2017)。公立高級中等以下學校教師成績考核辦法之法解釋論及法政策論之研究〔碩士論文,國立臺灣大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU201703851
洪淑芬(2015)。教師專業發展評鑑啟動經驗之分析-以臺中市一所國小為例〔碩士論文,逢甲大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6341/fcu.M0219682

延伸閱讀