In theory, we used to seen that the task of manager's financial decisions is to maximize firm value, and it is equal to maximize stock value. However, we assert this phrase under a restrictive set of conditions. This study analyzes abnormal bond, stock, and firm returns around repurchase announcements in Taiwan. We find the excess bond return is statistically significant, and forms the change of firm value is not the same as stock value. We also find evidence inconsistent with both signaling and wealth redistribution in the firm with stock and bond returns. Particularly, prior research has documented positive abnormal stock returns around the announcement of repurchase program. Once we just observe the firm with stock and bond returns, it appears a myth we never seen before with negative abnormal stock returns and positive abnormal bond returns. It shows the importance of bond return to assess financial decisions.